[ python-Feature Requests-1213703 ] Move test_method_checksum from test_unicodedata.
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Jun 3 02:38:53 CEST 2005
Feature Requests item #1213703, was opened at 2005-06-02 13:32
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rhettinger
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1213703&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Library
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Darek Suchojad (dsuch)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Move test_method_checksum from test_unicodedata.
Initial Comment:
Hi,
this isn't really an RFE but there's no Requests For
Modifications tracker anywhere ;-)
I was wondering if it would make sense to move
test_method_checksum from test_unicodedata to
test_unicode. This test doesn't deal with unicodedata
module at all; it's surely needed and an important one
but I think its location is somewhat misleading as it's
not using unicodedata module, it doesn't test this
module's behaviour.
What do you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Darek Suchojad (dsuch)
Date: 2005-06-02 16:08
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=954779
Ah, I get it. I'm trying to port unicodedata to Jython (so
far I have almost completed creating its pure-Python version
which I will rewrite in Java) and that's how I've discovered
this "inconsistency", but I understand your point, so I'll
just withdraw my proposal, it was just a thought after all...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Walter Dörwald (doerwalter)
Date: 2005-06-02 15:47
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=89016
test_unicodedata() might not use the unicodedata module, but
it uses the Unicode database, so I think this is justified.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1213703&group_id=5470
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list