[Python-bugs-list] [Bug #115555] Parser crashes for deeply nested list displays
noreply@sourceforge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:08:14 -0700
Bug #115555, was updated on 2000-Sep-28 03:42
Here is a current snapshot of the bug.
Project: Python
Category: Parser/Compiler
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Bug Group: Feature Request
Priority: 5
Summary: Parser crashes for deeply nested list displays
Details: Compiling
s=[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
gives an error message
s_push: parser stack overflow
Python 1.5.2 then reports a MemoryError, 2.0b2 a SyntaxError.
Follow-Ups:
Date: 2000-Sep-28 12:35
By: jhylton
Comment:
What is the desired outcome here? Python is reporting a SyntaxError; it's not crashing. Would you like to increase the max stack size for the parser? What should it's limit be?
The current parser stack limit allows eval("["*x+"]"*x) for values of x up to and including 35. I'm not sure why the limit is set this low. I bumped the value of MAXSTACK in parser.c from 500 to 5000 and it accepted the nest list expression for values of x up to 357.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2000-Sep-29 09:08
By: loewis
Comment:
It was confusing that Python would produce a SyntaxError for an obviously-correct script, and that such a small limit was found in the parser.
Since the limit is not due to recursion on the C stack: Would a patch removing this limitation be accepted (certainly not for 2.0). The two alternatives I see are to make the array completely dynamic, or to allocate a dynamic array in the stack if the static one overflows.
-------------------------------------------------------
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=115555&group_id=5470