[Python-bugs-list] [Bug #110695] complexobject.c optimization error on SGI (PR#144)
noreply@sourceforge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 20:46:06 -0700
Bug #110695, was updated on 2000-Jul-31 14:28
Here is a current snapshot of the bug.
Project: Python
Category: Core
Status: Open
Resolution: Remind
Bug Group: Platform-specific
Priority: 1
Summary: complexobject.c optimization error on SGI (PR#144)
Details: Jitterbug-Id: 144
Submitted-By: robert.harrison@pnl.gov
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 01:35:19 -0500 (EST)
Version: 1.5.2
OS: IRIX64 6.5
On an SGI (IRIX64 6.5, MIPSpro Compilers: Version 7.3.1m, -n32)
Python-1.5.2/Objects/complexobject.c does not compile correctly
with optimization. The problem shows up as a bus error in
PyComplex_ImagAsDouble when importing Numeric Python. All works fine
when this one file is compiled with -O0 (-O1 and higher fail).
I assume that this is probably just a compiler error.
====================================================================
Audit trail:
Fri Dec 03 10:39:28 1999 guido changed notes
Fri Dec 03 10:39:28 1999 guido moved from incoming to platformbug
Follow-Ups:
Date: 2000-Sep-07 15:03
By: jhylton
Comment:
Please do triage on this bug.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2000-Sep-16 15:02
By: bwarsaw
Comment:
Assigning to Fred, but we really need somebody with the specified OS to do platform specific testing.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2000-Sep-16 15:10
By: fdrake
Comment:
Sent a message to the original submitter asking if this is still a problem, and indicated that we don't have access to any SGI IRIX systems on which to perform testing.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2000-Sep-21 20:46
By: gvanrossum
Comment:
Set priority really low. SGI optimizer bugs are a common pain, but not worth losing sleep over.
Maybe just close it with "Wont Fix"?
-------------------------------------------------------
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=110695&group_id=5470