[Python-3000] Types and classes
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
amauryfa at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 00:03:58 CEST 2008
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Paul Prescod <paul at prescod.net> wrote:
> Apologies if this has been discussed before.
>
> But does anyone else find it odd that the types of some things are
> classes and the classes of some things are types?
>
> >>> type(socket.socket())
> <class 'socket.socket'>
> >>> type("abc")
> <type 'str'>
> >>> socket.socket().__class__
> <class 'socket.socket'>
> >>> "abc".__class__
> <type 'str'>
>
> In a recent talk I could only explain this as a historical quirk. As I
> understand, it is now possible to make types that behave basically
> exactly like classes and classes that behave exactly like types. Is
> there any important difference between them anymore?
I can find one difference:
- types are written in C
- classes are written in Python
and there is a difference in behaviour:
most types don't have a writable __dict__, and you cannot add members.
classes are more flexible.
--
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list