[Python-3000] PEP 3127 (integer literal syntax) -- any takers?

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Jun 11 20:50:39 CEST 2007


On 6/11/07, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
> Georg Brandl schrieb:
> > Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> >> PEP 3127 (Integer Literal Support and Syntax) introduces new notations
> >> for octal and binary integers. This isn't implemented yet. Are there
> >> any takers? It shouldn't be particularly complicated.
> >
> > Okay, it's done.
> >
> > I'll be grateful for reviews. I've also removed traces of the "L" literal
> > suffix where I encountered them, but may not have gotten them all.
>
> Ah, one thing in the PEP I haven't implemented is the special helpful
> syntax error message if you have an old-style octal literal in your code.
>
> If someone who wouldn't have to dig into tokenizer/parser details could
> do that, I'd be grateful :)

Or you could leave this up to the 2.6 backport team. :-)

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)


More information about the Python-3000 mailing list