[Python-3000] Renumbering old PEPs now targeted for Py3k?

[Barry Warsaw]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Jun 6, 2007, at 9:21 PM, Chris Monson wrote:

> Renumbering, +1; using the next 31xx number, +1.
>
> Renumbering +1
> Leaving (old PEP number) in place as a stripped down PEP that just  
> points to the new number: +1

I don't want to (accidentally) re-use the old number for some other  
PEP, and PEPs are intended to be the historical record of a feature,  
so my own preferences would be:

- - Leave the old PEP in place, with a pointer to the renumbered PEP
- - Renumber the PEP by putting a '3' in front of it instead of using  
the next available

We don't have a template for renumbered PEPs so just come up with  
something reasonable that fits the flavor of PEPs.  If we need to  
generalize later, we can.

- -Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBRmfv6nEjvBPtnXfVAQL1yAP9FOGBU5TMa4HUiP8IRoqS/wemFOdotHwf
GwvNPIEthJXheUBS/lOWLpSCERUzToSfqWzUJWkOUk5JfxsDP6MgWKwfkOwhvp35
oihXrkWoc/XtK2qJipLXVWLhg/5CkPuvnjXSrVMzqpu5J26YPV/QIb2Xa0ICF90e
c2mQY0cuzWM=
=HMOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----