[Python-3000] Renumbering old PEPs now targeted for Py3k?

[Chris Monson]

On 6/6/07, Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/6/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP
> > 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any
> > others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+
> > range. I can see two forms of renaming:
> >
> > (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number
> >
> > (b) just use the next available number
> >
> > Preferences?
> >
> > What other PEPs should be renumbered?
> >
> > Should we renumber at all?
>
> Renumbering, +1; using the next 31xx number, +1.


Renumbering +1
Leaving (old PEP number) in place as a stripped down PEP that just points to
the new number: +1

Collin Winter
> _______________________________________________
> Python-3000 mailing list
> Python-3000 at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/shiblon%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20070606/fec1137f/attachment.html