[Python-3000] Futures in Python 3000

[Guido van Rossum]

Let me just add that Andy is wasting his time. Python 3000 won't have
continuations.

On 4/20/06, Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> wrote:
>
> Andy Sy <andy at neotitans.com> wrote:
> > Err... thank you once again for being redundant, reiterating what is
> > already pretty much dead clear to everyone and saying nothing new
> > in general.
>
> And yet, here I notice that you've still not described a syntax or its
> execution semantics.  Instead you've chosen to spend your time insulting
> me.  Please continue, I'm sure it will make people want to read your
> future posts all the more.
>
>
> Ultimately, Guido is the judge of what is or is not Pythonic.  Without a
> description of what you want, no one can be for or against it, and
> ultimately, you are playing yourself to be very much like every other
> first-poster in python-dev or python-3000; 'I think Python would be
> better with feature/syntax/language construct X'.  This is not a mortal
> sin.
>
> I think it's about time to use a Tim Peters inspired closing.
>
> to-inattentive-to-really-be-insulted-ly y'rs - Josiah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-3000 mailing list
> Python-3000 at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org
>


--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)