[pytest-dev] [core] Tidelift Funding

[Ronny Pfannschmidt]

Am 06.05.19 um 16:03 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
> Hi Ronny,
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ronny Pfannschmidt 
> <opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de 
> <mailto:opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de>> wrote:
>
>     i think its a good idea to have this as a opt-in.
>
>     Currently a Fair Share Mechanism on a opt in basis seems fair,
>     if we ever hit a situation where someone could have a reasonably
>     set up part/full-time position primarily on pytest we should take
>     a look at how division is fair in that case.
>
>
> Agreed, thanks Ronny.
>
> If nobody objects, I plan to move this forward later this week.
>
> One question is how do we track which maintainers are opting to 
> receive funding.

>
> I'm thinking of opening an issue which lists the contributors 
> receiving the funding; maintainers are then free to post a comment 
> indicating if they want to start/stop receiving funding, at which 
> point we update the original post. Another option would be to use the 
> Wiki, but we don't receive change notifications so there's a chance of 
> we getting out of sync with the configuration on Tidelift. Suggestions?
>
we should make a git repo where we track meta level documentation,
that way we chould have a ci with credentials run the checks

i wonder if tidelift hasn an api published for that


> Another question is regarding admins of the Tidelift dashboard. I 
> volunteer to do it, but would like more people to also be admins to 
> reduce the bus factor, so other volunteers are appreciated as well.

in about 2-3 Months i can Commit to such role as well.


Cheers Ronny


>
> Cheers,
> Bruno.
>
>     -- Ronny
>
>
>     Am 03.05.19 um 14:11 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
>>     Hi Floris,
>>
>>     On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:25 PM Floris Bruynooghe <flub at devork.be
>>     <mailto:flub at devork.be>> wrote:
>>
>>         Why the rules about active?  Seems complicated and more open to
>>         arguing.  I liked the Pillow guidelines you linked:
>>         https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/contributors can express
>>         interest and https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/core
>>         decides on
>>         split (which I guess can be anything from 0% to 100%).  With
>>         the same
>>         assumption that the core members are reasonable that should
>>         end up as
>>         roughly the same.
>>
>>         Mind you in practice I have no issue with the above proposal
>>         of people
>>         right now, but would also not mind if e.g. hpk or ronny
>>         wanted to be
>>         part right now (I'll pass myself).  Likewise there are
>>         probably cases
>>         where I wouldn't mind people not in core being paid for some
>>         time.
>>
>>
>>     I wrote those "rules" just to come up with a solid proposal in
>>     the e-mail, but I do like yours better. Letting developers opt-in
>>     to a share is fair and reasonable, certainly.
>>
>>     I think we should even always split the funding evenly between
>>     those opting to receive it, to further avoid any arguing on that.
>>
>>         But in general I'm +1, let's make it happen if there's anyone
>>         interested
>>         in getting paid.
>>
>>
>>     Great, let's see what others think.
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     Bruno.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     pytest-dev mailing list
>>     pytest-dev at python.org  <mailto:pytest-dev at python.org>
>>     https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pytest-dev/attachments/20190506/fe2d327e/attachment.html>