[pypy-commit] pypy numppy-flatitter: review

fijal noreply at buildbot.pypy.org
Thu Jan 26 12:46:55 CET 2012


Author: Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com>
Branch: numppy-flatitter
Changeset: r51788:977157a7ea64
Date: 2012-01-26 13:46 +0200
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/changeset/977157a7ea64/

Log:	review

diff --git a/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW b/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW
--- a/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW
+++ b/pypy/module/micronumpy/REVIEW
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+* this file should go away before asking for a review :)
+
 * I think we should wait for indexing-by-arrays-2, since this would clean up
   the iterator interface
 
@@ -7,3 +9,17 @@
   duplication, since the indexing is getting slowly fairly complex.
 
 * iterating over a transposed array still fails.
+
+* next_skip_x is implemented badly. It still iterates over items (calls
+  next_skip n times) and is jit.unroll_safe. This means that the JIT will assume
+  skip is a constant and compile a linear trace unrolling all iterations. This
+  is *BAD*. Instead it would be something like:
+
+  for arrays:
+
+  res.offset = self.offset + skip
+
+  for views something slightly more complex that does appropriate modulo.
+
+  Note that next() has unroll_safe, because the loop only dependas on the
+  length of shape which is a constant for assembler.
\ No newline at end of file


More information about the pypy-commit mailing list