[pypy-commit] extradoc extradoc: mention what I did with syntax

[gutworth]

Author: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r4179:976290076952
Date: 2012-04-06 13:15 -0400
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/extradoc/changeset/976290076952/

Log:	mention what I did with syntax

diff --git a/blog/draft/py3k-status-update-3.rst b/blog/draft/py3k-status-update-3.rst
--- a/blog/draft/py3k-status-update-3.rst
+++ b/blog/draft/py3k-status-update-3.rst
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
 ``list(range())`` etc. As a result, the number of failing tests dropped_ from
 650 to 235: we are beginning to see the light at the end of the tunnel :-)
 
+Benjamin finished implementing Python 3 syntax. Most of it was small cleanups
+and tweaks to be compatible with CPython such as making ``True`` and ``False``
+keywords and preventing ``. . .`` from being parsed as ``Ellipsis``. Larger
+features syntax additions included keyword only arguments and function
+annotations.
+
 Finally, we did some RPython fixes, so that it is possible again to translate
 PyPy in the py3k branch. However, the resuling binary is a strange beast which
 mixes python 2 and python 3 semantics, so it is unusable for anything but
@@ -49,10 +55,8 @@
 branch, as you can clearly see in this activity graph. I would like to thank
 all who helped!
 
-XXX: benjamin, could you write a quick summary of what you did?
-
 cheers,
-Antonio
+Antonio and Benjamin
 
 .. _donated: http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2012/01/py3k-and-numpy-first-stage-thanks-to.html
 .. _`py3k proposal`: http://pypy.org/py3donate.html