[pypy-svn] r68017 - pypy/extradoc/talk/pycon2010

pedronis at codespeak.net pedronis at codespeak.net
Wed Sep 30 12:09:16 CEST 2009


Author: pedronis
Date: Wed Sep 30 12:09:15 2009
New Revision: 68017

Modified:
   pypy/extradoc/talk/pycon2010/jit_abstract.txt
Log:
be a bit less over-concrete

Modified: pypy/extradoc/talk/pycon2010/jit_abstract.txt
==============================================================================
--- pypy/extradoc/talk/pycon2010/jit_abstract.txt	(original)
+++ pypy/extradoc/talk/pycon2010/jit_abstract.txt	Wed Sep 30 12:09:15 2009
@@ -21,19 +21,14 @@
 
 Proposed talk agenda:
 
-* Show various benchmarking data and compare different
-  python interpreters (CPython, PyPy, Jython, IronPython, unladden swallow)
+* Show various benchmarking data and compare different Python interpreters
 
-* A bit of introduction into how PyPy's JIT work (it's tracing JIT,
-  like tracemonkey JS interpreter, unlike Psyco or JVM).
+* A bit of introduction into how PyPy's JIT work (it's a generated tracing JIT,
+  like the tracemonkey JS interpreter, unlike Psyco or JVM JITs).
 
-* What sorts of programs JITs in general can speed up. What sorts of
-  programs PyPy's JIT is better at. What similiar python constructs
-  can yield different performance characteristics while JITting.
+* Tracing JITs focus on often executed loops. Which kind of programs
+  will the PyPy JIT speed-up , which constructs we know it is currently poor at.
 
 * Future plans for PyPy, especially JIT-wise.
 
-The main wieght would be put on the point 3 (how can I write my program
-so JIT will make it fast).
-
 .. _`faster than Psyco`: http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2009/09/first-results-of-jit.html



More information about the Pypy-commit mailing list