From jackie at python.org Wed Jun 3 13:22:16 2020 From: jackie at python.org (Jackie Augustine) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:22:16 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] Are you looking forward to PyCon 2021? Message-ID: Hello All, We are excited to begin planning for PyCon 2021 and need your assistance. We all know that physical events will most likely have a new look in the future. We are asking a few questions to help us plan what PyCon 2021 may offer and provide for both in-person and virtual components. Please help by completing this survey, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/LS3PVB6 Thank you, Jackie -- *Jackie Augustine* *Event Manager* *@pycon* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ewa at python.org Fri Jun 5 15:56:56 2020 From: ewa at python.org (Ewa Jodlowska) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:56:56 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted Message-ID: Hi! The PSF 2020 board election nominations are now available for our voting members to check out: https://www.python.org/nominations/elections/2020-python-software-foundation-board/nominees/ . Ballots will be sent out June 8th. The voting end date will be *June 17, 2020 AoE* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mertz at gnosis.cx Fri Jun 5 18:48:47 2020 From: mertz at gnosis.cx (David Mertz) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 18:48:47 -0400 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: How many seats are opening up for this coming election? I confess that between the staggered terms, some off-cycle resignations, and whatnot, I haven't kept track. I intend to study all candidate profiles closely. But on a quick glance, I am excited that we could potentially elect an entire slate of extremely qualified people, all from the global south. On Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 3:57 PM Ewa Jodlowska wrote: > Hi! > > The PSF 2020 board election nominations are now available for our voting > members to check out: > https://www.python.org/nominations/elections/2020-python-software-foundation-board/nominees/ > . > > Ballots will be sent out June 8th. The voting end date will be *June 17, > 2020 AoE* > > > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Community mailing list > PSF-Community at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jodlowska2 at gmail.com Fri Jun 5 18:54:14 2020 From: jodlowska2 at gmail.com (Ewa Jodlowska) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:54:14 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi David- There are 4 seats available. Information can be confirmed here: https://www.python.org/nominations/elections/ Ewa On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:49 PM David Mertz wrote: > How many seats are opening up for this coming election? I confess that > between the staggered terms, some off-cycle resignations, and whatnot, I > haven't kept track. > > I intend to study all candidate profiles closely. But on a quick glance, I > am excited that we could potentially elect an entire slate of extremely > qualified people, all from the global south. > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 3:57 PM Ewa Jodlowska wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The PSF 2020 board election nominations are now available for our voting >> members to check out: >> https://www.python.org/nominations/elections/2020-python-software-foundation-board/nominees/ >> . >> >> Ballots will be sent out June 8th. The voting end date will be *June 17, >> 2020 AoE* >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PSF-Community mailing list >> PSF-Community at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community >> > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Community mailing list > PSF-Community at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mertz at gnosis.cx Sun Jun 7 16:14:37 2020 From: mertz at gnosis.cx (David Mertz) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:14:37 -0400 Subject: [PSF-Community] Selection Message in Helios In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am delighted to have just completed my vote for the slate of the 2020 term PSF Board. As my personal voting strategy, I read all of the candidate statements, and nominator statements where they were made, and basically tried to come up with any reason in my mind why a given candidate was not absolutely my highest preference. That said, even if ALL 4 seats go to folks I did not vote for, I will remain delighted by the outcome, since there are so many wonderful candidates running. At the completion of selection (in my case, of 11 candidates), I was presented with this message: [you under-voted: you may select up to 26] > I was, in the past, the PSF Voting Administrator, and introduced the use of Approval Voting as the election method (many years ago now). So I get what this means, but I am concerned that the phrasing may confuse new voters, or simply those less wrapped up in election arcana. I do not know if it is possible now to adjust that phrase slightly. ANY number of votes, from zero to 26 is technically valid in the Approval Voting style. It is a little bit pointless to vote for exactly 0 or exactly 26, since your vote will not affect the outcome in those cases (but it is still valid, and registers your participation). But any number of approvals from 1 to 25 will in some manner legitimately express a differential preference. When you vote, if you see a similar message, do not be alarmed by it. You are given an opportunity there to adjust your votes, if you wish, but you may also simply submit your vote with your desired number of selections, and it will be valid and counted. Yours, David... --- The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born, become abortifacients against new conceptions. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From naomi.ceder at gmail.com Sun Jun 7 16:23:56 2020 From: naomi.ceder at gmail.com (Naomi Ceder) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:23:56 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] Selection Message in Helios In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for clarifying, David. Let me second that message - you can vote for as many or as few of the nominees as you want, and your votes will be recorded. As David suggests, if everyone voted for all the candidates, there wouldn't be a decision. Cheers, Naomi On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 15:15, David Mertz wrote: > I am delighted to have just completed my vote for the slate of the 2020 > term PSF Board. As my personal voting strategy, I read all of the > candidate statements, and nominator statements where they were made, and > basically tried to come up with any reason in my mind why a given candidate > was not absolutely my highest preference. That said, even if ALL 4 seats > go to folks I did not vote for, I will remain delighted by the outcome, > since there are so many wonderful candidates running. > > At the completion of selection (in my case, of 11 candidates), I was > presented with this message: > > [you under-voted: you may select up to 26] >> > > I was, in the past, the PSF Voting Administrator, and introduced the use > of Approval Voting as the election method (many years ago now). So I get > what this means, but I am concerned that the phrasing may confuse new > voters, or simply those less wrapped up in election arcana. I do not know > if it is possible now to adjust that phrase slightly. > > ANY number of votes, from zero to 26 is technically valid in the Approval > Voting style. It is a little bit pointless to vote for exactly 0 or > exactly 26, since your vote will not affect the outcome in those cases (but > it is still valid, and registers your participation). But any number of > approvals from 1 to 25 will in some manner legitimately express a > differential preference. > > When you vote, if you see a similar message, do not be alarmed by it. You > are given an opportunity there to adjust your votes, if you wish, but you > may also simply submit your vote with your desired number of selections, > and it will be valid and counted. > > Yours, David... > > --- > The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the > not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse > the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born, > become abortifacients against new conceptions. > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Community mailing list > PSF-Community at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > -- Naomi Ceder @NaomiCeder ? https://www.naomiceder.tech https://www.manning.com/books/the-quick-python-book-third-edition -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From graffatcolmingov at gmail.com Sun Jun 7 16:20:07 2020 From: graffatcolmingov at gmail.com (Ian Stapleton Cordasco) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:20:07 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] [PSF-Vote] Selection Message in Helios In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That phrase, I believe, is part of Helios' default templates which the administrator can not change and has been there for the last several years in which we've used Helios. I agree that it is possibly confusing, but I suspect Ben would be willing to adjust it if you're willing to open an issue and have a dialogue there. Signed, A fellow former administrator On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM David Mertz wrote: > > I am delighted to have just completed my vote for the slate of the 2020 term PSF Board. As my personal voting strategy, I read all of the candidate statements, and nominator statements where they were made, and basically tried to come up with any reason in my mind why a given candidate was not absolutely my highest preference. That said, even if ALL 4 seats go to folks I did not vote for, I will remain delighted by the outcome, since there are so many wonderful candidates running. > > At the completion of selection (in my case, of 11 candidates), I was presented with this message: > >> [you under-voted: you may select up to 26] > > > I was, in the past, the PSF Voting Administrator, and introduced the use of Approval Voting as the election method (many years ago now). So I get what this means, but I am concerned that the phrasing may confuse new voters, or simply those less wrapped up in election arcana. I do not know if it is possible now to adjust that phrase slightly. > > ANY number of votes, from zero to 26 is technically valid in the Approval Voting style. It is a little bit pointless to vote for exactly 0 or exactly 26, since your vote will not affect the outcome in those cases (but it is still valid, and registers your participation). But any number of approvals from 1 to 25 will in some manner legitimately express a differential preference. > > When you vote, if you see a similar message, do not be alarmed by it. You are given an opportunity there to adjust your votes, if you wish, but you may also simply submit your vote with your desired number of selections, and it will be valid and counted. > > Yours, David... > > --- > The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the > not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse > the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born, > become abortifacients against new conceptions. > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Vote mailing list > PSF-Vote at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote From otteromkram at gmail.com Mon Jun 8 08:05:49 2020 From: otteromkram at gmail.com (Mark Moretto) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:05:49 -0400 Subject: [PSF-Community] [PSF-Vote] Selection Message in Helios In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: David, Thank you for the clarification. Personally, I believe all candidates are very well-qualified and, combined with their enthusiasm about Python and maintaining a top-tier, open-source platform, selecting only a few is incredibly challenging. I want to vote for them all! The PSF is lucky to be able to select from such a group. Kindest, Mark Moretto On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 4:15 PM David Mertz wrote: > I am delighted to have just completed my vote for the slate of the 2020 > term PSF Board. As my personal voting strategy, I read all of the > candidate statements, and nominator statements where they were made, and > basically tried to come up with any reason in my mind why a given candidate > was not absolutely my highest preference. That said, even if ALL 4 seats > go to folks I did not vote for, I will remain delighted by the outcome, > since there are so many wonderful candidates running. > > At the completion of selection (in my case, of 11 candidates), I was > presented with this message: > > [you under-voted: you may select up to 26] >> > > I was, in the past, the PSF Voting Administrator, and introduced the use > of Approval Voting as the election method (many years ago now). So I get > what this means, but I am concerned that the phrasing may confuse new > voters, or simply those less wrapped up in election arcana. I do not know > if it is possible now to adjust that phrase slightly. > > ANY number of votes, from zero to 26 is technically valid in the Approval > Voting style. It is a little bit pointless to vote for exactly 0 or > exactly 26, since your vote will not affect the outcome in those cases (but > it is still valid, and registers your participation). But any number of > approvals from 1 to 25 will in some manner legitimately express a > differential preference. > > When you vote, if you see a similar message, do not be alarmed by it. You > are given an opportunity there to adjust your votes, if you wish, but you > may also simply submit your vote with your desired number of selections, > and it will be valid and counted. > > Yours, David... > > --- > The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the > not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse > the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born, > become abortifacients against new conceptions. > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Vote mailing list > PSF-Vote at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From antoine at python.org Mon Jun 8 14:00:00 2020 From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 20:00:00 +0200 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> Hello, One thing that's been helpful in the CPython developer community is a message board (Discourse in this case, but the specifics don't matter) where we could ask questions to the various Steering Committee candidates. This would be welcome for the PSF board elections as well. Regards Antoine. Le 05/06/2020 ? 21:56, Ewa Jodlowska a ?crit?: > Hi! > > The PSF 2020 board election nominations are now available for our voting > members to check out: > https://www.python.org/nominations/elections/2020-python-software-foundation-board/nominees/.? > > Ballots will be sent out June 8th. The voting end date will be _June 17, > 2020 AoE_ > > > > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Community mailing list > PSF-Community at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > From ewa at python.org Mon Jun 8 14:12:59 2020 From: ewa at python.org (Ewa Jodlowska) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:12:59 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> References: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:00 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > One thing that's been helpful in the CPython developer community is a > message board (Discourse in this case, but the specifics don't matter) > where we could ask questions to the various Steering Committee > candidates. This would be welcome for the PSF board elections as well. > > That's a great idea. Since candidates were not given a heads up to prepare or put aside time, we will add this for next year. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jurnell at civichacker.com Mon Jun 8 14:22:43 2020 From: jurnell at civichacker.com (Jurnell Cockhren) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:22:43 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> Message-ID: Hey all, My company, Civic Hacker, can provide a private Mastodon instance for this purpose or similar. I would love to help the PSF in such a tangible way. Jurnell On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:13 PM Ewa Jodlowska wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:00 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> One thing that's been helpful in the CPython developer community is a >> message board (Discourse in this case, but the specifics don't matter) >> where we could ask questions to the various Steering Committee >> candidates. This would be welcome for the PSF board elections as well. >> >> That's a great idea. > > Since candidates were not given a heads up to prepare or put aside time, > we will add this for next year. > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Community mailing list > PSF-Community at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > -- Jurnell Cockhren Founder @ Civic Hacker https://civichacker.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pjj at philipjohnjames.com Mon Jun 8 14:49:35 2020 From: pjj at philipjohnjames.com (Philip James) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:49:35 -0700 Subject: [PSF-Community] [PSF-Vote] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> Message-ID: While I'm a huge fan of Mastodon (I run wandering.shop), I'm a bigger fan of using tools we already have. :) Given that https://discuss.python.org/ already exists, using that in the future seems fairly reasonable to me? There's also nothing stopping folks from starting a thread there now, of course, but I interpret Ewa's point as "We didn't let the candidates know this was expected of them, so it's not super fair to start this discussion there now. It's still a great idea, and we should do that next time." I agree with that, because otherwise it's an unfair advantage to the candidates who are closely following this thread and know to show up to the forum. PJJ http://philipjohnjames.com On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:36 AM Maria Petri Betto < maria.betto at u.northwestern.edu> wrote: > I also like this idea. I think the existing Slack workspace could also fit > this purpose well. Though a PSF Mastodon instance would be cool in general > and wouldn't require logging in to Slack. > > Best, > > Maria > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 1:25 PM Jurnell Cockhren > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> My company, Civic Hacker, can provide a private Mastodon instance for >> this purpose or similar. I would love to help the PSF in such a tangible >> way. >> >> Jurnell >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:13 PM Ewa Jodlowska wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:00 PM Antoine Pitrou >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> One thing that's been helpful in the CPython developer community is a >>>> message board (Discourse in this case, but the specifics don't matter) >>>> where we could ask questions to the various Steering Committee >>>> candidates. This would be welcome for the PSF board elections as well. >>>> >>>> That's a great idea. >>> >>> Since candidates were not given a heads up to prepare or put aside time, >>> we will add this for next year. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PSF-Community mailing list >>> PSF-Community at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jurnell Cockhren >> Founder @ Civic Hacker >> https://civichacker.com >> _______________________________________________ >> PSF-Vote mailing list >> PSF-Vote at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote >> > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Vote mailing list > PSF-Vote at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maria.betto at u.northwestern.edu Mon Jun 8 14:34:47 2020 From: maria.betto at u.northwestern.edu (Maria Petri Betto) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:34:47 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] [PSF-Vote] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> Message-ID: I also like this idea. I think the existing Slack workspace could also fit this purpose well. Though a PSF Mastodon instance would be cool in general and wouldn't require logging in to Slack. Best, Maria On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 1:25 PM Jurnell Cockhren wrote: > Hey all, > My company, Civic Hacker, can provide a private Mastodon instance for this > purpose or similar. I would love to help the PSF in such a tangible way. > > Jurnell > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:13 PM Ewa Jodlowska wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:00 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> One thing that's been helpful in the CPython developer community is a >>> message board (Discourse in this case, but the specifics don't matter) >>> where we could ask questions to the various Steering Committee >>> candidates. This would be welcome for the PSF board elections as well. >>> >>> That's a great idea. >> >> Since candidates were not given a heads up to prepare or put aside time, >> we will add this for next year. >> _______________________________________________ >> PSF-Community mailing list >> PSF-Community at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community >> > > > -- > Jurnell Cockhren > Founder @ Civic Hacker > https://civichacker.com > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Vote mailing list > PSF-Vote at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thomas at python.org Wed Jun 10 09:05:33 2020 From: thomas at python.org (Thomas Wouters) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:05:33 +0200 Subject: [PSF-Community] [PSF-Vote] PSF Board Election Update: Nominees Posted In-Reply-To: References: <33f04b74-8eb8-69dd-73f4-18e145324570@python.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 8:50 PM Philip James wrote: > While I'm a huge fan of Mastodon (I run wandering.shop), I'm a bigger fan > of using tools we already have. :) Given that https://discuss.python.org/ > already exists, using that in the future seems fairly reasonable to me? > > There's also nothing stopping folks from starting a thread there now, of > course, but I interpret Ewa's point as "We didn't let the candidates know > this was expected of them, so it's not super fair to start this discussion > there now. It's still a great idea, and we should do that next time." > > I agree with that, because otherwise it's an unfair advantage to the > candidates who are closely following this thread and know to show up to the > forum. > Not to mention the fact that voting has already started, so getting people to invest time to ask questions may be too much to ask :). I do like the idea of giving people a chance to get to know the candidates better, though, so I would love for this to happen (as Ewa said, next year) -- but in that case, I feel there should be some room between the candidates being announced and the actual election. > > PJJ > http://philipjohnjames.com > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:36 AM Maria Petri Betto < > maria.betto at u.northwestern.edu> wrote: > >> I also like this idea. I think the existing Slack workspace could also >> fit this purpose well. Though a PSF Mastodon instance would be cool in >> general and wouldn't require logging in to Slack. >> >> Best, >> >> Maria >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 1:25 PM Jurnell Cockhren >> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, >>> My company, Civic Hacker, can provide a private Mastodon instance for >>> this purpose or similar. I would love to help the PSF in such a tangible >>> way. >>> >>> Jurnell >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:13 PM Ewa Jodlowska wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:00 PM Antoine Pitrou >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> One thing that's been helpful in the CPython developer community is a >>>>> message board (Discourse in this case, but the specifics don't matter) >>>>> where we could ask questions to the various Steering Committee >>>>> candidates. This would be welcome for the PSF board elections as well. >>>>> >>>>> That's a great idea. >>>> >>>> Since candidates were not given a heads up to prepare or put aside >>>> time, we will add this for next year. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PSF-Community mailing list >>>> PSF-Community at python.org >>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jurnell Cockhren >>> Founder @ Civic Hacker >>> https://civichacker.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PSF-Vote mailing list >>> PSF-Vote at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> PSF-Vote mailing list >> PSF-Vote at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote >> > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Vote mailing list > PSF-Vote at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-vote > -- Thomas Wouters Hi! I'm an email virus! Think twice before sending your email to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anirudhastark at yahoo.com Mon Jun 15 00:50:05 2020 From: anirudhastark at yahoo.com (Kumar Anirudha) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PSF-Community] PyCon India 2020 CFP open References: <538307012.604549.1592196605356.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <538307012.604549.1592196605356@mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, PyCon India 2020 is live and calling all the brilliant pythonistas to submit their proposals for talk. PyCon India 2020 will be held from Oct 2-5, completely online. So, no matter where you're at, you'll be able to join in the action. View other proposals and submit yours: [1]Read more about our CFP guidelines: [2]Follow the PyCon India Website [3], Zulip [4] and Twitter Handle @pyconindia for more updates. Cheers,Kumar AnirudhaOn behalf of PyCon India 2020 team [1]: https://in.pycon.org/cfp/2020/proposals/[2]: https://in.pycon.org/blog/2020/2020-call-for-proposals-announcement.html[3]: https://in.pycon.org/2020/[4]: https://pyconindia.zulipchat.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kanak.kvdi at gmail.com Tue Jun 16 13:54:57 2020 From: kanak.kvdi at gmail.com (Kanak Kavadi) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:24:57 +0530 Subject: [PSF-Community] Issue with the link In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, I have found that in the original email, the link to [1] Read more about our CFP guidelines/proposals when clicked shows take to *page not found. *That is because in the reference links below, the "[2]" is appended to the link like shown in bold here: [1] https://in.pycon.org/cfp/2020/proposals*/[2] * Which is actually redirecting you to the link *https://in.pycon.org/cfp/2020/proposals/%5B2%5D *and not* https://in.pycon.org/cfp/2020/proposals * which is the desired page. *Solution:* Please enter a space between [1] https://in.pycon.org/cfp/2020/proposals **[2] in your listed references. I hope this helps. Regards, Kanak Kavadi BE, Computer Science and Engineering Contributing Member PSF On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 PM wrote: > Send PSF-Community mailing list submissions to > psf-community at python.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > psf-community-request at python.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > psf-community-owner at python.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of PSF-Community digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. PyCon India 2020 CFP open (Kumar Anirudha) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 04:50:05 +0000 (UTC) > From: Kumar Anirudha > To: "psf-community at python.org" > Subject: [PSF-Community] PyCon India 2020 CFP open > Message-ID: <538307012.604549.1592196605356 at mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi all, > PyCon India 2020 is live and calling all the brilliant pythonistas to > submit their proposals for talk. PyCon India 2020 will be held from Oct > 2-5, completely online. So, no matter where you're at, you'll be able to > join in the action. > View other proposals and submit yours: [1]Read more about our CFP > guidelines: [2]Follow the PyCon India Website [3], Zulip [4] and Twitter > Handle @pyconindia for more updates. > Cheers,Kumar AnirudhaOn behalf of PyCon India 2020 team > > [1]: https://in.pycon.org/cfp/2020/proposals/[2]: > https://in.pycon.org/blog/2020/2020-call-for-proposals-announcement.html[3]: > https://in.pycon.org/2020/[4]: https://pyconindia.zulipchat.com/ > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/psf-community/attachments/20200615/d4efdf86/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > PSF-Community mailing list > PSF-Community at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community > > > ------------------------------ > > End of PSF-Community Digest, Vol 57, Issue 7 > ******************************************** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From betsy at python.org Wed Jun 24 16:14:19 2020 From: betsy at python.org (Betsy Waliszewski) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:14:19 -0700 Subject: [PSF-Community] PSF at Summer of OSCON - coupon codes for live event Message-ID: Hi all, As part of our participation in Summer of OSCON , we are eligible to invite up to 10 people from our community to participate in the event. Included is a 90-day subscription to the O'Reilly Learning Platform. In addition, participants will also have full access to all of the learning resources on oreilly.com. If you're interested in a free pass, please email me directly and I'll provide the codes. Best, Betsy -- Betsy Waliszewski *Pronouns: she/her/hers* Event Planner / Sponsorship Coordinator @ThePSF As a non-profit organization, the PSF depends on sponsorships and donations to support the Python community. Check out our Annual Impact Report for more details: https://www.python.org/psf/annual-report/2019/ Please contribute to the PSF; we can't continue our work without your support! https://www.python.org/psf/donations/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From me at lorenamesa.com Thu Jun 25 12:09:10 2020 From: me at lorenamesa.com (Lorena Mesa) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:09:10 -0500 Subject: [PSF-Community] Join us at discuss.python.org to discuss PSF Board of Director Elections Reform Message-ID: Hello Python friends, The PSF Board of Directors have started a discussion over on discuss.python.org regarding PSF Board of Directors election reform. We'd love to hear your thoughts and input! You can find the thread here: https://discuss.python.org/t/psf-board-election-reform/4527?u=lorenanicole. Thank you in advance! Best, __________________________________________________________________ *Lorena Mesa* Co-Organizer, PyLadies Chicago Director & Vice-Chair Elect, Python Software Foundation www.lorenamesa.com @loooorenanicole Pronouns: she/her/hers Say what? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: