[Patches] [ python-Patches-860326 ] PyErrr_Display and traceback.format_exception_only behaviour

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Sat Aug 26 22:40:28 CEST 2006


Patches item #860326, was opened at 2003-12-15 08:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gvanrossum
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=860326&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Modules
Group: Python 3000
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jürgen Hermann (jhermann)
>Assigned to: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Summary: PyErrr_Display and traceback.format_exception_only behaviour

Initial Comment:
PyErrr_Display and traceback.format_exception_only
behave differently; namely, the first one prints the
module of an exception, the latter not.

The attached tb_problem.py illustrates the problem, it
prints:

Error: text

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "tb_problem.py", line 3, in ?
    raise uu.Error("text")
uu.Error: text

(note the diff betwen "Error:..." and "ui.Error:...")

The attached patch fixes this. Python 2.2.2 has the
same problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2006-08-26 16:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6380

Committed in the p3yk branch as revision 51625.

This isn't exactly the same patch, and also fixes the
doctests that this here patch broke, but it fixes the same
issue.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-04-30 04:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849994

Seems like this is an item for Python 3000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2006-04-12 22:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Opened this again.  Anthony reverted the patch on both trunk
and 2.4 branch.  Whether it will be applied on the trunk
again is being discussed on python-dev.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2006-04-12 21:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

As noted on python-dev, the 2.4-branch backport should be
reverted, because it changes visible behavior (including
causing at least three of the standard tests to fail).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-04-12 17:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849994

Late is better than never ;)

Thanks for the patch, I applied it as rev. 45321, 45322(2.4).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=860326&group_id=5470


More information about the Patches mailing list