[Patches] [ python-Patches-578494 ] PEP 282 Implementation

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Patches item #578494, was opened at 2002-07-08 00:50
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=578494&group_id=5470

Category: Library (Lib)
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Vinay Sajip (vsajip)
Assigned to: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Summary: PEP 282 Implementation

Initial Comment:
The attached file implements PEP282. The file logging-
0.4.6.tar.gz is the entire distribution including 
setup/install, test/example scripts, and TeX 
documentation. The file logging.py (within the .tar.gz) is 
all that is needed to implement the PEP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Vinay Sajip (vsajip)
Date: 2002-10-16 09:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=308438

The logging.tar.gz is an in-between-releases version which I 
have uploaded for GvR review. It contains the logging module 
refactored as a package. __init__.py contains the core 
including FileHandler and StreamHandler; handlers.py 
contains all the other handlers; and config.py contains the file-
based config stuff.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2002-08-02 21:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6380

Um, Mark, looks like you accidentally closed this!

I reopened it and assigned it to me for review. I'm gonna
read the PEP and see if I like the design decisions enough
to pronounce acceptance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2002-07-10 02:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The code seems high quality and well documented.  I have no
concerns with logging.py as such.

I have two main issues:
* Design decisions:  looking over python-dev, I can not see
a consensus on the design decisions.  I believe that *some*
type of official acceptance of the design should be decreed
by someone.

* Source structure: while this seems quite suitable for an
extension module, the format of the patch is probably not
quite correct for a core module.  For example, the test code
should probably be integrated with the standard Python test
suite (even if in a sub-directory), the Tex docs integrated
with Python's docs etc

So while I think the patch is high quality I believe these
issues need to be addressed before I can do much more.

Setting to "pending" - but good stuff tho!  Please drive
this through!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Vinay Sajip (vsajip)
Date: 2002-07-08 00:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=308438

Added just the logging.py file to make it easier to review.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=578494&group_id=5470