[Patches] #100888: btutt -> jhylton [Closed] Fix UCNs machine with >= 32bit longs

[Ka-Ping Yee]

http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100888&group_id=5470

Status: Closed
Submitted By: btutt
Category: None
Summary: Fix UCNs machine with >= 32bit longs
Assigned To: jhylton
Patch: View Raw Patch
Date: 2000-Jul-14 05:22

2000-Jul-25 20:56 - jhylton wrote:
    We have decided to go w /F's database which does not use the ucnhash stuff. The ucnhash is too esoteric for the Python core, so Andrew will be maintaining it from his own Web pages. I've committed the changes anyway; until the larger issue is resolve, test_ucn works in Linux64.

2000-Jul-25 15:56 - tmick wrote:
    I applied the patch on Linux64. test_ucn.py now passes. An email from Bill Tutt on python-dev indicated that I don't need to test it on Win64.
    
    Back to Bill.

2000-Jul-17 10:24 - tmick wrote:
    I haven't yet looked at the patch but I will (after Monterey).
    
    > Nope the ucnhash.c stuff isn't needed given Fredrik's new 
    > patch
    
    DOes this mean that the patch is obselete now or that part of it needs to removed? Pardon if this is a stupid question. (As I said above I will look at this after Monterey).

2000-Jul-16 13:43 - btutt wrote:
    Nope the ucnhash.c stuff isn't needed given Fredrik's new patch.

2000-Jul-16 06:49 - lemburg wrote:
    Is the ucnhash.c part of this patch still needed in the light of Fredrik's new module ?

2000-Jul-14 07:28 - jhylton wrote:
    Trent, Can you test this on a machine with >32 bits

2000-Jul-25 20:56 - jhylton changed patch_status_id (previously Open)
2000-Jul-25 20:56 - jhylton changed close_date (previously 1969-Dec-31 16:00)
2000-Jul-25 15:56 - tmick changed assigned_to (previously tmick)
2000-Jul-14 07:28 - jhylton changed assigned_to (previously none)