From rob.townley at gmail.com Fri Feb 1 10:08:08 2013 From: rob.townley at gmail.com (Rob Townley) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 03:08:08 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python Koans In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > That is surprising. Just checked my Fork of Python Koans and only I am > listed under users. > I wonder if there is an account level setting that kicks in when a fork > occurs. Only thing I can think of that would be different between your > account and mine. hmmm nope, I don't see anything under Account that would > cause that kind of effect. > > > hmmmmm. > If you investigate, please let me know what you find out. I'm curious. > > -Jeff > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > >> Hey, i just now noticed that when i forked python_koans, the original >> owners are are committers on my own project. >> >> The BitBucket.org Access Management section lists Greg Malcom and >> matthewalmond with "READ WRITE ADMIN" privileges. >> >> i first noticed in my BitBucket.org "Sent" folder, emails i did not >> manually send. >> Every project i forked has automatically given Admin access to the >> parent and grandparent project owners >> >> This is different from github. A github fork of xrdp does not have >> any other collaborators. >> i do not care that BitBucket does this. Afterall, version control >> leaves an audit trail. >> Further, the other admins appear to be deletable, i just did not know. >> _______________________________________________ >> Omaha Python Users Group mailing list >> Omaha at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha >> http://www.OmahaPython.org >> > > > > -- > Best, > > Jeff Hinrichs > 402.218.1473 > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org When forking, if the CheckBox "Permissions Inherit repository user/group permissions" is checked, the original authors will have admin access to your project. DUH. From rob.townley at gmail.com Fri Feb 1 18:11:33 2013 From: rob.townley at gmail.com (Rob Townley) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:11:33 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python Koans In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Last night, sparse GIMP foo and file sizes too big to post to a mailing list. Here is a screenshot of the checkmark in question: > When forking, if the CheckBox > "Permissions Inherit repository user/group permissions" > is checked, the original authors will have admin access > to your project. DUH. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ForkAdminInheritance1-256color.png Type: image/png Size: 31238 bytes Desc: not available URL: From newz at bearfruit.org Mon Feb 4 23:33:09 2013 From: newz at bearfruit.org (Matthew Nuzum) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:33:09 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Instead of using Gitorious, might as well go ahead and do Gitlab. It uses Gitorious at its heart but gives you some of the best features of Github as well. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > Hey, if other people want a real private repository for say HIPAA > reasons, the following video is so easy. > > http://getgitorious.com/installer > > is a video from one of the gitorious.org developers promising your own > private version of gitorious.org can be installed in about 30 minutes > and is pretty much unattended. > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- Matthew Nuzum newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin and twitter ? You're never fully dressed without a smile! ? From jeffh at dundeemt.com Tue Feb 5 01:54:18 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:54:18 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: If you need private as in HIPAA you need it and there isn't another way. However, if you can swing it (scrub the sensitive bits out that tend to accumulate in a private repo) outsourcing is a good thing for a repos. Besides having distributed repos, bitbucket has an api, so I can bring a copy down weekly to tape. Big fan of bitbucket team -- use it at work/personal. No jabs at github, but I like hg -- haven't needed the mind bending things git is capable of, but bitbucket supports git too. And yes, I have a github account too ;) Best, Jeff p.s. not having to administer day to day repo back end, hardware, upgrades. Can't say that I'm sorry about that. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > Instead of using Gitorious, might as well go ahead and do Gitlab. It uses > Gitorious at its heart but gives you some of the best features of Github as > well. > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Rob Townley > wrote: > > > Hey, if other people want a real private repository for say HIPAA > > reasons, the following video is so easy. > > > > http://getgitorious.com/installer > > > > is a video from one of the gitorious.org developers promising your own > > private version of gitorious.org can be installed in about 30 minutes > > and is pretty much unattended. > > _______________________________________________ > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > Omaha at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > > > > -- > Matthew Nuzum > newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin and twitter > > ? You're never fully dressed without a smile! ? > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From tmseiler at gmail.com Tue Feb 5 16:40:09 2013 From: tmseiler at gmail.com (Tom Seiler) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:40:09 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: So how about strictly internal hg hosting with a modern interface? There's the built-in hgweb or RhodeCode, but is there anything else worth-while? On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > If you need private as in HIPAA you need it and there isn't another way. > However, if you can swing it (scrub the sensitive bits out that tend to > accumulate in a private repo) outsourcing is a good thing for a repos. > > Besides having distributed repos, bitbucket has an api, so I can bring a > copy down weekly to tape. Big fan of bitbucket team -- use it at > work/personal. No jabs at github, but I like hg -- haven't needed the mind > bending things git is capable of, but bitbucket supports git too. And yes, > I have a github account too ;) > > Best, > > Jeff > p.s. not having to administer day to day repo back end, hardware, upgrades. > Can't say that I'm sorry about that. > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > > > Instead of using Gitorious, might as well go ahead and do Gitlab. It uses > > Gitorious at its heart but gives you some of the best features of Github > as > > well. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Rob Townley > > wrote: > > > > > Hey, if other people want a real private repository for say HIPAA > > > reasons, the following video is so easy. > > > > > > http://getgitorious.com/installer > > > > > > is a video from one of the gitorious.org developers promising your own > > > private version of gitorious.org can be installed in about 30 minutes > > > and is pretty much unattended. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > > Omaha at python.org > > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthew Nuzum > > newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin and twitter > > > > ? You're never fully dressed without a smile! ? > > _______________________________________________ > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > Omaha at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > > > -- > Best, > > Jeff Hinrichs > 402.218.1473 > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > From mike at squarepegsystems.com Tue Feb 5 17:00:45 2013 From: mike at squarepegsystems.com (Mike Hostetler) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:00:45 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: I did a gitolite install once but I wouldn't recommend it. Actually, how it works it very clever -- each user gives the admin their public keys, and gitolite uses those to save the history. But the documentation is bad, and the author put "don't ask me questions, read the documentation." Classy. We currently use gitblit for our git repos (we have some HIPAA stuff, so no outside hosting). It provides the basic web service and shows history, charts, etc. It doesn't do the full-blown github thing where you click a button and you have your own branch of it. But, in most work settings, that's not necessary. One nice thing about gitblit is that it's a Java webapp. Yes, for once that's nice! You install Tomcat, edit the gitblit config, put it in Tomcat and then it just works. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > Instead of using Gitorious, might as well go ahead and do Gitlab. It uses > Gitorious at its heart but gives you some of the best features of Github as > well. > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Rob Townley > wrote: > > > Hey, if other people want a real private repository for say HIPAA > > reasons, the following video is so easy. > > > > http://getgitorious.com/installer > > > > is a video from one of the gitorious.org developers promising your own > > private version of gitorious.org can be installed in about 30 minutes > > and is pretty much unattended. > > _______________________________________________ > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > Omaha at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > > > > -- > Matthew Nuzum > newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin and twitter > > ? You're never fully dressed without a smile! ? > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- Mike Hostetler SquarePeg Systems http://www.squarepegsystems.com From jeffh at dundeemt.com Thu Feb 7 00:22:11 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:22:11 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: There is always hgweb and on the mercurial site they have a list of other solutions http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/PublishingRepositories The pressure for internal dcvs systems is not gigantic. If you have the need for that level of control, often you will find those entities also unwilling to give up the master repo setup of cvs, svn, perforce, et al. There are arguments to be made. We were, are to a degree still, a subversion shop. The last remaining repos were not in shape (security scrubbing) to be worth the investment to just do it and push out. Over time, they will be scrubbed, reviewed and then released to private 3rd party repos. I used hgsubversion for about a year and half. It's ok, but full blown hg or git is still substantially better than a kind of/sort of dcvs client/ master backend. (imho, of course) bitbucket has added a number of new features over the past 12 months, github still retains the lead in web features though. The stuff I use often is there on bitbucket so I haven't had any qualms about using the service. Stuff like merging a pull request via the web interface is nice, code commenting, pull commenting, etc. github does it too. Merging and forking is soooo much easier and less frustrating than with cvs or svn. Don't want to bag on hgweb, I've never used it. And had been living with viewvcs.cgi for years for a web interface to our svn repos. So all of this is just dreamy in comparison. ;) You should give hgweb a look. Best, Jeff On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom Seiler wrote: > So how about strictly internal hg hosting with a modern interface? There's > the built-in hgweb or RhodeCode, but is there anything else worth-while? > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T >wrote: > > > If you need private as in HIPAA you need it and there isn't another way. > > However, if you can swing it (scrub the sensitive bits out that tend to > > accumulate in a private repo) outsourcing is a good thing for a repos. > > > > Besides having distributed repos, bitbucket has an api, so I can bring a > > copy down weekly to tape. Big fan of bitbucket team -- use it at > > work/personal. No jabs at github, but I like hg -- haven't needed the > mind > > bending things git is capable of, but bitbucket supports git too. And > yes, > > I have a github account too ;) > > > > Best, > > > > Jeff > > p.s. not having to administer day to day repo back end, hardware, > upgrades. > > Can't say that I'm sorry about that. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Matthew Nuzum > wrote: > > > > > Instead of using Gitorious, might as well go ahead and do Gitlab. It > uses > > > Gitorious at its heart but gives you some of the best features of > Github > > as > > > well. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Rob Townley > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, if other people want a real private repository for say HIPAA > > > > reasons, the following video is so easy. > > > > > > > > http://getgitorious.com/installer > > > > > > > > is a video from one of the gitorious.org developers promising your > own > > > > private version of gitorious.org can be installed in about 30 > minutes > > > > and is pretty much unattended. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > > > Omaha at python.org > > > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthew Nuzum > > > newz2000 on freenode, skype, linkedin and twitter > > > > > > ? You're never fully dressed without a smile! ? > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > > Omaha at python.org > > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best, > > > > Jeff Hinrichs > > 402.218.1473 > > _______________________________________________ > > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > > Omaha at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > > http://www.OmahaPython.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From rob.townley at gmail.com Thu Feb 7 20:02:03 2013 From: rob.townley at gmail.com (Rob Townley) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:02:03 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > There is always hgweb and on the mercurial site they have a list of other > solutions > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/PublishingRepositories > > The pressure for internal dcvs systems is not gigantic. If you have the > need for that level of control, often you will find those entities also > unwilling to give up the master repo setup of cvs, svn, perforce, et al. > There are arguments to be made. > > We were, are to a degree still, a subversion shop. The last remaining > repos were not in shape (security scrubbing) to be worth the investment to > just do it and push out. Over time, they will be scrubbed, reviewed and > then released to private 3rd party repos. > > I used hgsubversion for about a year and half. It's ok, but full blown hg > or git is still substantially better than a kind of/sort of dcvs client/ > master backend. (imho, of course) > > bitbucket has added a number of new features over the past 12 months, > github still retains the lead in web features though. The stuff I use > often is there on bitbucket so I haven't had any qualms about using the > service. Stuff like merging a pull request via the web interface is nice, > code commenting, pull commenting, etc. github does it too. Merging and > forking is soooo much easier and less frustrating than with cvs or svn. > > Don't want to bag on hgweb, I've never used it. And had been living with > viewvcs.cgi for years for a web interface to our svn repos. So all of this > is just dreamy in comparison. ;) > You should give hgweb a look. > hg beats any other _command_ simply because it is the easiest to type. Two index fingers in the middle of the home row. Superior. hg should have been the first command ever for any OS. For our users, simplicity would help. Use case is not just for source code version control, but also just plain document management for noobs. i will look at hgweb and the other mentioned. From jay at jays.net Thu Feb 7 22:03:21 2013 From: jay at jays.net (Jay Hannah) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:03:21 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > hg beats any other _command_ simply because it is the easiest to type. > Two index fingers in the middle of the home row. Superior. hg > should have been the first command ever for any OS. alias g="git" :) j From jeffh at delasco.com Thu Feb 7 22:06:47 2013 From: jeffh at delasco.com (Jeff Hinrichs) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:06:47 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Easy install of a private gitorious server. In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: *snort* -Jeff On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Jay Hannah wrote: > On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Rob Townley wrote: > > hg beats any other _command_ simply because it is the easiest to type. > > Two index fingers in the middle of the home row. Superior. hg > > should have been the first command ever for any OS. > > alias g="git" > > :) > > j > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > From jeffh at dundeemt.com Mon Feb 11 02:56:43 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:56:43 -0600 Subject: [omaha] django and testing Message-ID: Is anyone on the list using factories instead of fixtures for django testing? Was watching a pycon video https://pycon-2012-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/testing_and_django.html# and the presenter talked about burning fixtures and use factories, specifically factory_boy, instead. It sounds really nice as the pain points it stops, broken fixtures do to db migrations and ease of creating test data -- both of which I've dealt with recently. I've been kicking the tires and testing the approach out a bit. I've liked what I've found so much that I wrote a script to turn fixtures into factories, https://bitbucket.org/dundeemt/fixture_to_factory I'm looking for any wisdom others might have, who have more experience with this method. Gotch'yas, factory layout and integration in the django structure, etc. -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From mike at squarepegsystems.com Tue Feb 12 17:53:41 2013 From: mike at squarepegsystems.com (Mike Hostetler) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:53:41 -0600 Subject: [omaha] django and testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I meant to do reply yesterday, but didn't get to it. I use a combination of fixtures and lists/mock objects (i.e. objects that look like my models, but are objects that I created myself). I actually prefer the mock objects -- I have more control, I don't have to create and destroy a database each time. But sometimes fixtures are easier -- it's easy to take a snapshot of your existing data, especially if it's in the "troublesome" state and then start writing tests to figure out what is wrong. I also try to have a strong delineation between my Django application (the view and save) and the "real work". I really try to have little logic in my views but designate that to other functions and classes that may nor may not know anything about Django. Generally they just accept some objects, check the state of said objects, and create an object and send it back. The calling class is responsible for the persistence. How successful I am on that goal is a good question. ;) But doing work like that does making writing tests easier, because you have less database work to deal with. My $0.02 . . . On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > Is anyone on the list using factories instead of fixtures for django > testing? > > Was watching a pycon video > https://pycon-2012-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/testing_and_django.html# > and the presenter talked about burning fixtures and use factories, > specifically factory_boy, instead. > > It sounds really nice as the pain points it stops, broken fixtures do to db > migrations and ease of creating test data -- both of which I've dealt with > recently. > > I've been kicking the tires and testing the approach out a bit. I've liked > what I've found so much that I wrote a script to turn fixtures into > factories, https://bitbucket.org/dundeemt/fixture_to_factory > > I'm looking for any wisdom others might have, who have more experience with > this method. Gotch'yas, factory layout and integration in the django > structure, etc. > > > -- > Best, > > Jeff Hinrichs > 402.218.1473 > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- Mike Hostetler SquarePeg Systems http://www.squarepegsystems.com From choman at gmail.com Wed Feb 13 18:23:12 2013 From: choman at gmail.com (Chad Homan) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:23:12 -0600 Subject: [omaha] [OT] DYMO Label writers Message-ID: Try to "network'ize" a DYMO laberwriter (specifically the 450 turbo). Outside of buying a "DYMO printer server", has anyone had any luck with a third party USB based print server. Together We Win! -- Chad - I AM MONAVIE Do You Know Your Life Score? Creating A More Meaningful Life From jeffh at dundeemt.com Tue Feb 19 03:47:54 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:47:54 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Omaha Python Meetup - 2/20 Message-ID: Our next meeting on G+ Meetup is set for tomorrow night @ 7pm. Email the list with your request for an invitation. We are looking for topic suggestions! What would you like to talk about or hear about? I'd offer a Django talked, entitled "Burn All Fixtures" -- How the pain of creating fixtures caused me to get rid of all of them, easily and making my test suite run 10x faster and throw off the yolk of brittle fixtures when I make changes to my models. Looking for others to offer up talks/ subjects, everyone in the group votes for what they want to hear about. Looking forward to the best meeting ever! -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From jrguliz at yahoo.com Tue Feb 19 04:57:23 2013 From: jrguliz at yahoo.com (Joe Gulizia) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:57:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: [omaha] Omaha Python Meetup - 2/20 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1361246243.66640.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Tuesday night?? Why the change? Joe ________________________________ From: Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T To: Omaha Python Users Group Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:47 PM Subject: [omaha] Omaha Python Meetup - 2/20 Our next meeting on G+ Meetup is set for tomorrow night @ 7pm.? Email the list with your request for an invitation. We are looking for topic suggestions!? What would you like to talk about or hear about? I'd offer a Django talked, entitled "Burn All Fixtures" -- How the pain of creating fixtures caused me to get rid of all of them, easily and making my test suite run 10x faster and throw off the yolk of brittle fixtures when I make changes to my models. Looking for others to offer up talks/ subjects, everyone in the group votes for what they want to hear about. Looking forward to the best meeting ever! -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 _______________________________________________ Omaha Python Users Group mailing list Omaha at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha http://www.OmahaPython.org From jeffh at dundeemt.com Tue Feb 19 05:10:07 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:10:07 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Omaha Python Meetup - 2/20 In-Reply-To: <1361246243.66640.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1361246243.66640.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Sorry, had the date right, 2/20 which is Wednesday. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Joe Gulizia wrote: > Tuesday night? Why the change? > > Joe > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T > To: Omaha Python Users Group > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:47 PM > Subject: [omaha] Omaha Python Meetup - 2/20 > > Our next meeting on G+ Meetup is set for tomorrow night @ 7pm. Email the > list with your request for an invitation. > > We are looking for topic suggestions! What would you like to talk about or > hear about? > > I'd offer a Django talked, entitled "Burn All Fixtures" -- How the pain of > creating fixtures caused me to get rid of all of them, easily and making my > test suite run 10x faster and throw off the yolk of brittle fixtures when I > make changes to my models. > > Looking for others to offer up talks/ subjects, everyone in the group votes > for what they want to hear about. > > Looking forward to the best meeting ever! > > > > -- > Best, > > Jeff Hinrichs > 402.218.1473 > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From jeffh at dundeemt.com Thu Feb 21 01:18:16 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:18:16 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Online Meeting tonight! G+ Hangout Message-ID: Meeting tonight. I'll fire up the hangout about 6:50pm and start sending out invites. You need an invite to attend. Just respond to this post for an invite. -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From jaybocc2 at gmail.com Thu Feb 21 02:07:50 2013 From: jaybocc2 at gmail.com (Jay Bendon) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:07:50 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Online Meeting tonight! G+ Hangout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: cmhanlon at gmail and myself please. --Jay On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > Meeting tonight. I'll fire up the hangout about 6:50pm and start sending > out invites. You need an invite to attend. > > Just respond to this post for an invite. > > > > -- > Best, > > Jeff Hinrichs > 402.218.1473 > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > From jay at jays.net Fri Feb 22 23:07:25 2013 From: jay at jays.net (Jay Hannah) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:07:25 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python night at CoVis CoWorking (apparently) Message-ID: Huh. An impromptu, small, VERY unofficial Python User Group meeting has broken out here at CoVis tonight... :) http://www.covisco.com/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/307780699294181/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/249545298491406/ j From jeffh at delasco.com Sat Feb 23 01:06:13 2013 From: jeffh at delasco.com (Jeff Hinrichs) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:06:13 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python night at CoVis CoWorking (apparently) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Well that is totally awesome! First I've heard about CoVis -- Hubert is a great guy and knows python. -Jeff On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jay Hannah wrote: > > Huh. An impromptu, small, VERY unofficial Python User Group meeting has > broken out here at CoVis tonight... :) > > http://www.covisco.com/ > https://www.facebook.com/groups/307780699294181/ > https://www.facebook.com/groups/249545298491406/ > > j > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > From shawnhermans at gmail.com Mon Feb 25 16:16:10 2013 From: shawnhermans at gmail.com (Shawn Hermans) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:16:10 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python One Liners Message-ID: Ran across this article on Python one liners. Anyone else got some good one liners? I am found of the timeit one liner listed. I have used that a lot. http://www.vurt.ru/2013/02/python-command-line-oneliners/ From jeffh at dundeemt.com Tue Feb 26 07:41:30 2013 From: jeffh at dundeemt.com (Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:41:30 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python One Liners In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've used the httpserver before, but haven't used any of the others (1 liners that is). The last bit at the end about reading through the source it an excellent idea. There are a number of great bits in the library with regards to coding idioms and patterns. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Shawn Hermans wrote: > Ran across this article on Python one liners. Anyone else got some good > one liners? I am found of the timeit one liner listed. I have used that a > lot. > > http://www.vurt.ru/2013/02/python-command-line-oneliners/ > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- Best, Jeff Hinrichs 402.218.1473 From wes.turner at gmail.com Wed Feb 27 17:05:09 2013 From: wes.turner at gmail.com (Wes Turner) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:05:09 -0600 Subject: [omaha] Python One Liners In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >From http://docs.python.org/2/library/json.html : echo '{"json":"obj"}' | python -mjson.tool I am also a big fan of http://docs.python.org/2/library/simplehttpserver.html : python -m SimpleHTTPServer localhost:8080 TIL http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14545001/what-tools-are-available-in-python-standard-library/14545364 On Tuesday, February 26, 2013, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T wrote: > I've used the httpserver before, but haven't used any of the others (1 > liners that is). > > The last bit at the end about reading through the source it an excellent > idea. There are a number of great bits in the library with regards to > coding idioms and patterns. > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Shawn Hermans wrote: > >> Ran across this article on Python one liners. Anyone else got some good >> one liners? I am found of the timeit one liner listed. I have used that a >> lot. >> >> http://www.vurt.ru/2013/02/python-command-line-oneliners/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Omaha Python Users Group mailing list >> Omaha at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha >> http://www.OmahaPython.org >> > > > > -- > Best, > > Jeff Hinrichs > 402.218.1473 > _______________________________________________ > Omaha Python Users Group mailing list > Omaha at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/omaha > http://www.OmahaPython.org > -- -- Wes Turner