[Numpy-discussion] Call for Reviewers

[Dr. Mark Alexander Mikofski PhD]

Hi all,

I've never reviewed a Numpy PR before, but I have reviewed a (very) few
SciPy PR's. I can help tag stale PR's. Just let me know where should I
start, or what would be most helpful.

Thanks,
Mark

On Wed, May 20, 2020, 1:29 PM Anirudh Subramanian <anirudh2290 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This topic was brought up in the triage meeting today. Numpy is seeing a
> huge surge in the number of PRs (current open PRs: 253) which could means
> two things: 1. Increase in volume of incoming PRs 2. Not enough reviewers
> to review the PRs.
>
> One thing that was discussed in the meeting was to add a stale label : "61
> - Stale" which has already been added by Sebastian.
>
> The community needs some help here and I think you can help irrespective
> of your level of experience with the numpy codebase:
>
> 1. Experienced numpy developers - To help review PRs for the areas they
> are already familiar with.
> 2. New contributors - Can help tag a stale PR or summarizing a long
> running discussing and next or reviewing PRs/triaging issues (for example
> DOC PRs should be a good starting point).
>
> Numpy community has been generous with Triage access and if you are
> interested in Triaging PRs or Issues, please reply on this thread and a
> committer should probably be able to help.
>
> I welcome more inputs on what we should do to reduce the number of open
> PRs, and what would help increase contributors or for contributors to do
> more reviews.
>
> Anirudh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20200521/4765d37e/attachment.html>