[Numpy-discussion] New Indexing Methods Revival #N (subclasses!)

[Sebastian Berg]

On Di, 2016-09-06 at 13:59 -0400, Marten van Kerkwijk wrote:
> In a separate message, since perhaps a little less looney: yet
> another
> option would be work by analogy with np.ix_ and define pre-dispatch
> index preparation routines np.ox_ and np.vx_ (say), which would be
> used as in:
> ```
> array[np.ox_[:, 10]]   -- or -- array[np.vx_[:, 10]]
> ```
> This could work if those functions each return something appropriate
> for the legacy indexer, or, if that is not possible, a specific
> subclass of tuple as a marker that gets interpreted further up.

Sure, it would be a solution, but not sure it is any better
implementation wise then just passing an extra argument. As for the
syntax for plain arrays, I am not convinced to be honest.

- Sebastian


> In the end, though, probably also too complicated. It may remain best
> to simply implement the new methods instead and keep it at that!
> 
> -- Marten
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20160906/e1e9b06a/attachment.sig>