[Numpy-discussion] Numpy set_printoptions, silent failure, bug?

[Juan Nunez-Iglesias]

https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues


From: John Ladasky <jladasky at itu.edu> <jladasky at itu.edu>
Reply: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
<numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
Date: 20 July 2016 at 7:49:10 AM
To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
<numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
Subject:  Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy set_printoptions, silent failure,
bug?

Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for your reply.  If no one disagrees with you or with me that this
> is a Numpy bug, I would appreciate being directed to the appropriate page
> to submit a bug-fix request.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41 PM, John Ladasky <jladasky at itu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > Should this be considered a Numpy bug, or is there some reason that
>> set_printoptions would legitimately need to accept a dictionary as a single
>> argument?
>>
>> There is no such reason. One could certainly add more validation to the
>> arguments to np.set_printoptions().
>>
>> --
>> Robert Kern
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
>> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.*
> *Research Scientist*
> *International Technological University*
> *2711 N. First St, San Jose, CA 95134 USA*
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20160719/793c8164/attachment.html>