[Numpy-discussion] Sign of NaN

[Chris Barker - NOAA Federal]

One of the usecases that has sneaked in during the last few numpy versions
is that object arrays contain numerical arrays where the shapes don't add
up to a rectangular array.


I think that's the wrong way to dve that problem -- we really should have a
"proper" ragged array implementation. But is is the easiest way at this
point.

For this, and other use-cases, special casing Numpy arrays stored in object
arrays does make sense:

"If this is s a Numpy array, pass the operation through."

-CHB


In those cases being able to apply numerical operations might be useful.

But I'm +0 since I don't work with object arrays.

Josef



> -n
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150929/190b5642/attachment.html>