[Numpy-discussion] Proposal to remove the Bento build.

[David Cournapeau]

If everybody wants to remove bento, we should remove it.

Regarding single file builds, why would it help for static builds ? I
understand it would make things slightly easier to have one .o per
extension, but it does not change the fundamental process as the exported
symbols are the same in the end ?

David

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi All,
>  .
> I'm bringing up this topic again on account of the discussion at
> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/6199. The proposal is to stop
> (trying) to support the Bento build system for Numpy and remove it. Votes
> and discussion welcome.
>
> Along the same lines, Pauli has suggested removing the single file builds,
> but Nathaniel has pointed out that it may be the only way to produce static
> python + numpy builds. If anyone does that or has more information about
> it, please comment.
>
> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150819/b2b55e04/attachment.html>