[Numpy-discussion] Consider improving numpy.outer's behavior with zero-dimensional vectors

Neil Girdhar mistersheik at gmail.com
Tue Apr 14 21:17:24 EDT 2015


Ok, I didn't know that.  Are you at pycon by any chance?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Yes, I totally agree with you regarding np.sum and np.product, which is
> why
> > I didn't suggest np.add.reduce, np.multiply.reduce.  I wasn't sure
> whether
> > cumsum and cumprod might be on the line in your judgment.
>
> Ah, I see. I think we should treat them the same for now -- all the
> comments I made apply to a lesser or greater extent (in particular,
> cumsum and cumprod both do the thing where they dispatch to .cumsum()
> .cumprod() method).
>
> -n
>
> --
> Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150414/8af49da1/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list