[Numpy-discussion] numpy.filled, again

[josef.pktd at gmail.com]

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
>> >> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
>> >
>> >
>> > No objection.
>>
>> full full full
>>
>> np.full  full of what?
>>
>> full of the number it's filledwith
>>
>> no objections so far, from what I remember of this thread
>>
>> we take an empty array, fill it and then it's "full"
>
>
> You mean "fulled"? ;)

It's really "full", if you want to put something else in there, you
need to replace something that is already in there.

Fortunately, arrays are mutable and not "constant"

(However np.empty doesn't give you an array that's really empty.)

Josef


>
> <snip>
>
> Chuck
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>