[Numpy-discussion] Plans for missing data

[Lluís]

Charles R Harris writes:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Lluís <xscript at gmx.net> wrote:
>     Hi there,
    
>     I haven't been able to find an answer after a quick search, but are there
>     any
>     plans regarding the (re)inclusion of missing data support into some future
>     version of numpy?
    

> Not at the moment, but it sits in the back of my mind. Mark's dynd work will
> include missing values at some point and I think we should see what that looks
> like. We also need to agree on how they should be interpreted.

> They won't be in 1.8, too little time for that.

Thanks for the info.


Lluis

-- 
 "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
 something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
 -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
 Tollbooth