[Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking

Thouis (Ray) Jones thouis at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 19:18:39 EDT 2012


On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
>>> week.  I want to get an up-to-date snapshot of the Trac DB, and run
>>> another test import with it (just to make sure there's nothing in
>>> recent bugs that isn't handled).
>>>
>>> Previous test imports here:
>>> https://github.com/thouis/numpy-trac-migration/issues
>>
>> I successfully imported all the issues from a more recent snapshot to
>> the test repository as @numpy-gitbot, rather than @thouis (to save
>> myself from getting pulled into every bug's discussion).
>>
>> If no one sees any problems with the latest imports (basically, the
>> last 2000 or so by github issue #) , I think it's ready for the real
>> transfer to the numpy github repository.
>
> This is really fabulous; thanks for all the effort you've put in!
>
> But... I am quite concerned that we're still linking to attachments in
> the trac, e.g.:
>   https://github.com/thouis/numpy-trac-migration/issues/6002#issuecomment-9492223
>
> This means that we can't ever take down the trac without breaking all
> our github issues; we're committing to keeping the trac running
> indefinitely. Doesn't that kind of defeat a lot of the point...?

Not actually.  I have a snapshot of the attachments, as well, and once
there's a place for them live (another repository, possibly), we can
use the github API to edit the issues in place to point to the new
URLs.

Ray



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list