[Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking

[Ralf Gommers]

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> The issue tracking discussion seems to have died. Since github issues
>>> looks to be a viable alternative at this point, I propose to turn it on for
>>> the numpy repository and start directing people in that direction.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good, as long as we don't create duplicates or do something to
>> make the conversion from Trac harder.
>>
>>
> I looked into this a bit, and it looks like the first task is to set up
> labels. They should probably track what we currently have for trac in order
> to make moving some (all?) of the tickets over. I'm thinking component,
> priority, type, milestone, and version, omitting the keywords. I'm not sure
> how we should handle attachments.
>

Version can be left out I think, unless someone finds it useful.

We can think about extra labels too. I'd like "easy-fix", as a guide for
new contributors to issues to get started on.

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20120604/6af52792/attachment.html>