[Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted
Friedrich Romstedt
friedrichromstedt at gmail.com
Sun Oct 10 14:46:23 EDT 2010
2010/10/9 Vincent Davis <vincent at vincentdavis.net>:
> Did you get any responses on this? I can install 10.5 and help out
> with some testing. I have a macbookpro that does not turn of (Hardware
> issue) but it is good for testing. I could setup remote access on this
> if of interest to you.
I can also help with the installer - I have some (some) experience
with building Mac OS X installers using the PackageMaker provided by
Apple. Just lacking a 10.5. But since I need some anyway (for
controlling a 10.5 server), Vincent, if you don't need your 10.5
anymore, can we transfer the license in some way from you to me? I'm
serious, one cannot buy 10.5 from Apple anymore, and I need a legal
license. I have 10.6 and a VMware Fusion v3.
When anyone can inform me how the installation scheme for numpy
binaries is I can then provide the installers, I believe. I strongly
support 10.5 support, I believe we should support at least the next to
last version.
For my own installer for upy, I followed the route: Unpacking the
package into some /private/var/tmp directory, and running setup.py
install there (since we are root when installing). upy is pure
Python, no compilation. I see so far three routes for numpy: a) just
installing the precompiled binaries using a setup.py file, b)
compiling in the background for the user (shouldn't be a problem on
Mac OS X, and would give us opportunity to include support for
complementary packages in a "binary installer". Tough it wouldn't be
really binary anymore.) c) Hardcoding the /Frameworks/ directory and
simply copying.
What do we like best?
Friedrich
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list