[Numpy-discussion] Removing datetime support for 1.4.x series ?
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 00:17:23 EST 2010
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:03 PM, David Cournapeau <david at silveregg.co.jp>wrote:
> Charles R Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, David Cournapeau <david at silveregg.co.jp
> > <mailto:david at silveregg.co.jp>> wrote:
> >
> > Charles R Harris wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, David Cournapeau
> > <david at silveregg.co.jp <mailto:david at silveregg.co.jp>
> > > <mailto:david at silveregg.co.jp <mailto:david at silveregg.co.jp>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > josef.pktd at gmail.com <mailto:josef.pktd at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:josef.pktd at gmail.com <mailto:josef.pktd at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > > scipy is relatively easy to compile, I was thinking also
> > of h5py,
> > > > pytables and pymc (b/c of pytables), none of them are
> > importing with
> > > > numpy 1.4.0 because of the cython issue.
> > >
> > > As I said, all of them will have to be regenerated with
> > cython 0.12.1.
> > > There is no other solution,
> > >
> > >
> > > Wait, won't the structures be the same size? If they are then the
> > cython
> > > check won't fail.
> >
> > Yes, but the structures are bigger (even after removing the datetime
> > stuff, I had the cython warning when I did some tests).
> >
> >
> > That's curious. It sounds like it isn't ABI compatible yet.
>
> The Cython problem was that before 0.12.1, it failed importing whenever
> the struct size changed. You can change struct size and keep ABI
> compatibility (as long as nobody includes the struct in their own code),
>
>
Sure, but I don't recall any additions to structures apart from the datetime
stuff and the metadata element.
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20100211/4eb88392/attachment.html>
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list