[Numpy-discussion] proposing a "beware of [as]matrix()" warning
David Warde-Farley
dwf at cs.toronto.edu
Mon Apr 26 20:19:25 EDT 2010
Trying to debug code written by an undergrad working for a colleague of
mine who ported code over from MATLAB, I am seeing an ugly melange of
matrix objects and ndarrays that are interacting poorly with each other
and various functions in SciPy/other libraries. In particular there was
a custom minimizer function that contained a line "a * b", that was
receiving an Nx1 "matrix" and a N-length array and computing an outer
product. Hence the unexpected 6 GB of memory usage and weird results...
We've had this discussion before and it seems that the matrix class
isn't going anywhere (I *really* wish it would at least be banished from
the top-level namespace), but it has its adherents for pedagogical
reasons. Could we at least consider putting a gigantic warning on all
the functions for creating matrix objects (matrix, mat, asmatrix, etc.)
that they may not behave quite so predictably in some situations and
should be avoided when writing nontrivial code?
There are already such warnings scattered about on SciPy.org but the
situation is so bad, in my opinion (bad from a programming perspective
and bad from a new user perspective, asking "why doesn't this work? why
doesn't that work? why is this language/library/etc. so stupid,
inconsistent, etc.?") that the situation warrants steering people still
further away from the matrix object.
I apologize for ranting, but it pains me when people give up on
Python/NumPy because they can't figure out inconsistencies that aren't
really there for a good reason. IMHO, of course.
David
David
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list