[Numpy-discussion] Funded work on Numpy: proposed improvements and request for feedback

[David Goldsmith]

Gotchya, thanks!

DG

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Funded work on Numpy: proposed improvements and request for feedback
> To: "Discussion of Numerical Python" <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 2:53 PM
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:49, David
> Goldsmith<d_l_goldsmith at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- On Tue, 8/4/09, Bruce Southey <bsouthey at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> Almost a year ago Travis send an email :
> >> 'Report from SciPy'?
> >> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2008-August/036909.html
> >>
> >> Of importance was that
> >> " * NumPy 2.0 will be a library and will not
> automagically
> >> import numpy.fft
> >
> > As someone who tends to think of "modules" as
> "libraries" (renamed for Python for "branding" purposes),
> what's the difference?
> 
> Poor phrasing. I believe Travis meant something along the
> lines of
> "NumPy 2.0 will be a [well-behaved] library and will not
> automagically
> import numpy.fft." The informative part is the latter
> point.
> 
> -- 
> Robert Kern
> 
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma,
> a harmless
> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to
> interpret it as
> though it had an underlying truth."
>   -- Umberto Eco
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>