[Numpy-discussion] Why NaN?

David Goldsmith d_l_goldsmith at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 4 13:45:01 EDT 2009


Actually, Robert's really a robot (indeed, the Kernel of all robot minds) - no way a biologic is going to beat him. ;-)

DG

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Why NaN?
> To: "Discussion of Numerical Python" <numpy-discussion at scipy.org>
> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 10:08 AM
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:05, <josef.pktd at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > What's going on with the response time here?
> >
> > I cannot even finish reading the question and start
> python.
> 
> Practice. :-)
> 
> -- 
> Robert Kern
> 
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma,
> a harmless
> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to
> interpret it as
> though it had an underlying truth."
>   -- Umberto Eco
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
> 


      



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list