[Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Wed May 7 20:14:22 EDT 2008


On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Anne Archibald <peridot.faceted at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>:
>
> > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald <
> peridot.faceted at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <millman at berkeley.edu>:
> > >
> > > > I have just created the 1.1.x branch:
> > > >  http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134
> > > >  In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch.  At
> > > >  this point only critical bug fixes should be applied to the branch.
> > > >  The trunk is now open for 1.2 development.
> > >
> > > I committed Travis' matrix indexing patch (plus a basic test) to
> > > 1.1.x. Hope that's okay. (All tests pass.)
> > >
> >
> > You should put it in the 1.2 branch also, then. I think fancy indexing
> and
> > tolist, which Travis mentioned as having matrix workarounds, need to be
> > checked to see if they still work correctly for matrices with the patch.
>
> Ah. Good point. I did find a bug - x[:,0] doesn't do what you'd
> expect. Best not release without either backing out my change. I'm
> still trying to track down what's up.


Returns a column matrix here, using  1.2.0.dev5143 after Travis's commits.
What should it do?

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080507/69c2e043/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list