[Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch
David Cournapeau
cournape at gmail.com
Fri Dec 26 20:57:13 EST 2008
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't understand why. The whole point of union in that case is to
> make it clear that type punning is ok, since by definition the two
> values start at the same address. If this broke aliasing, any union
> would. Here is what man gcc tells me under the -fstrict-aliasing:
>
hm, seems to be a gcc extension, actually, so you're right. We have to
find another way, then.
David
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list