[Numpy-discussion] Native byteorder representation
Travis Oliphant
oliphant at ee.byu.edu
Fri Feb 2 12:22:12 EST 2007
Francesc Altet wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We have been bitten by a small glitch related with the representation of
>native byteorders. Here is an example exposing the problem:
>
>
>
>>>>numpy.dtype('<i4').byteorder
>>>>
>>>>
>'='
>
>
>>>>numpy.dtype('>i4').newbyteorder('little').byteorder
>>>>
>>>>
>'<'
>
>
>
This is somewhat inconsistent. But, I'm not sure it's worth changing.
In the second case, you request a "little" byteorder data-type. Keeping
this as '<' seems O.K.
One could instead ask why the first example did not report a byte-order
of "<" when that's what was explicitly asked for.
-Travis
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list