[Numpy-discussion] Args for rand and randn: call for a vote
Christopher Barker
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Mon Jul 10 14:30:59 EDT 2006
Ed Schofield wrote:
> * Should numpy.rand and numpy.randn accept sequences of dimensions as
> arguments, like rand((3,3)), as an alternative to rand(3,3)?
+1
+1 for ONLY allowing tuples.
Or just get rid of it.
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list