[Numpy-discussion] Speeding up Numeric
konrad.hinsen at laposte.net
konrad.hinsen at laposte.net
Sat Jan 22 00:11:00 EST 2005
On 21.01.2005, at 22:40, Paul F. Dubois wrote:
> As I mentioned in a recent post, the original Numeric philosphy was
> damn the torpedos full steam ahead; performance first, safety second.
> There was a deliberate decision not to handle NaN, inf, or anything
> like it, and if you overflowed you should die.
There was also at some time the idea of having a "safe" version of the
code (added checks as a compile-time option) and an installer that
compiled both with different module names such that one could
ultimately choose at run time which one to use. I really liked that
idea, but it never got implemented (there was a "safe" version of ufunc
in some versions but it was no different from the standard one).
Konrad.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list