[Numpy-discussion] Numeric 24.0
Perry Greenfield
perry at stsci.edu
Wed Apr 6 15:09:51 EDT 2005
I'll echo Fernando's comments.
On Apr 6, 2005, at 1:41 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> Michiel Jan Laurens de Hoon wrote:
>
>>> But SciPy has been moving away (e.g. by replacing functions by
>>> methods).
>> Michiel, you seem to want to create this impression that "SciPy" is
>> "moving away." I'm not sure of your motivations. But, since this
>> is a public forum, I have to restate emphatically, that "SciPy" is
>> not "moving away from Numeric." It is all about bringing together
>> the communities. For the 5 years that scipy has been in development,
>> it has always been about establishing a library of common routines
>> that we could all share. It has built on Numeric from the
>> beginning. Now, there is another "library" of routines that is
>> developing around numarray. It is this very real break that I'm
>> trying to help fix. I have no other "desire" to "move away" or
>> "create a break" or any other such notions that you seem to want to
>> spread.
>
> FWIW, I think you (Travis) have been exceedingly clear in explaining
> this process, and in pointing out how this is:
>
> a) NOT a further split, but rather the EXACT OPPOSITE (numarray users
> will have a transition path back into a project which will provide the
> best of the old Numeric, along with all the critical enhancements
> which Perry, Todd et al. added to numarray).
>
> b) a way, via the array protocol, to provide third-party low-level
> libraries an easy way to, AT THE C LEVEL, interact easily and
> efficiently (without unnecessary copies) with numeri* arrays.
>
>
[...]
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list