[melbourne-pug] last post

[Noon Silk]

> [1] This is the reason I fall into the "mailing list automatically
setting reply-to header is bad" camp.

Yeah, I think I kind of agree actually.

--
Noon


On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Brian May <brian at microcomaustralia.com.au>
wrote:

> Apologies for the last post - assuming it got through, it was suppose to
> be a private reply, but I failed to notice in time that this mailing list
> sets the reply-to header, and as such the private reply was redirected back
> to the list[1].
>
> I don't think there was anything actually private in my email, however
> apologies for breaking mailing list etiquette.
>
> [1] This is the reason I fall into the "mailing list automatically setting
> reply-to header is bad" camp.
>
> _______________________________________________
> melbourne-pug mailing list
> melbourne-pug at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
>
>


-- 
Noon Silk, ن

https://sites.google.com/site/noonsilk/

"Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy
of being this signature."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/melbourne-pug/attachments/20150525/adc13c55/attachment.html>