From noonslists at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 01:45:15 2012 From: noonslists at gmail.com (Noon Silk) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 09:45:15 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] [Slightly-OT] - Ad-hoc sharing of private git repos Message-ID: Hello, So I have a question that I don't think is too far off topic for this list. Let's say I have a private git repo at, for example, bitbucket.org. This is all well and good and I do work in it commiting various things. Then, let's say I decide I'd like to temporarily give read-access to someone else. I can give them access to the entire repo via bitbucket (and probably similarly via other services); however I want to only give access to a certain folder. At the moment I think the answer is "bad luck, it should be a different repo". So, I've kind of done this. But is that the best answer? Is there any way anyone can think of to have a sort of short-term share of a repo? For example, one incredibly straightforward idea is to do a symlink from the folder to a public (or whatever) dropbox folder, and share that. Any other ideas? I suppose if I had my own git server the answer would be pretty obvious - just create new repos and kind of share them like that (maybe even leaving the originals in the original repo and doing some offensive symlink stuff). But for some reason I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea of creating repos on this sort of arbitrary basis. Is that wrong? Should I be happy with it? (One of the reasons I'm not is that it really makes the business of committing changes in this super repository hard; I'd have to write some scripts to auto-commit all children, or share commit messages, or something ...) One aspect of the solution is that ideally it would be possible to get a copy of everything via something other than git (hence I suppose the dropbox plan is the best one); but I'd be okay if it were a web interface or something. Appreciate any thoughts. -- Noon Silk Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy of being this signature." From noonslists at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 02:45:36 2012 From: noonslists at gmail.com (Noon Silk) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:45:36 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] [Slightly-OT] - Ad-hoc sharing of private git repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Upon further review, you can probably disregard this. I think the answer is really just quite straightforward. For read-only access, dropbox or similar (ftp, whatever) is appropriate. For read/write, a new repository is appropriate. In that case I should just convert the folder to be a new repo, make it a sub-repo of my own thing, and control the access that way. Then the only change is that I should somehow have group commit/push commands for this repository; then so be it. On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Noon Silk wrote: > Hello, > > So I have a question that I don't think is too far off topic for this list. > > Let's say I have a private git repo at, for example, bitbucket.org. > This is all well and good and I do work in it commiting various > things. Then, let's say I decide I'd like to temporarily give > read-access to someone else. I can give them access to the entire repo > via bitbucket (and probably similarly via other services); however I > want to only give access to a certain folder. At the moment I think > the answer is "bad luck, it should be a different repo". So, I've kind > of done this. But is that the best answer? Is there any way anyone can > think of to have a sort of short-term share of a repo? For example, > one incredibly straightforward idea is to do a symlink from the folder > to a public (or whatever) dropbox folder, and share that. Any other > ideas? > > I suppose if I had my own git server the answer would be pretty > obvious - just create new repos and kind of share them like that > (maybe even leaving the originals in the original repo and doing some > offensive symlink stuff). But for some reason I'm not entirely > comfortable with the idea of creating repos on this sort of arbitrary > basis. Is that wrong? Should I be happy with it? (One of the reasons > I'm not is that it really makes the business of committing changes in > this super repository hard; I'd have to write some scripts to > auto-commit all children, or share commit messages, or something ...) > > One aspect of the solution is that ideally it would be possible to get > a copy of everything via something other than git (hence I suppose the > dropbox plan is the best one); but I'd be okay if it were a web > interface or something. Appreciate any thoughts. > > -- > Noon Silk > > Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ > > "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy > of being this signature." -- Noon Silk Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy of being this signature." From tleeuwenburg at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 03:16:26 2012 From: tleeuwenburg at gmail.com (Tennessee Leeuwenburg) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:16:26 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] [Slightly-OT] - Ad-hoc sharing of private git repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think there are some systems which layer over the top and provide more fine-grained access controls. Gitolite springs to mind. But I really don't know what I'm talking about, so probably it's a red herring. On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Noon Silk wrote: > Upon further review, you can probably disregard this. I think the > answer is really just quite straightforward. For read-only access, > dropbox or similar (ftp, whatever) is appropriate. > > For read/write, a new repository is appropriate. In that case I should > just convert the folder to be a new repo, make it a sub-repo of my own > thing, and control the access that way. Then the only change is that I > should somehow have group commit/push commands for this repository; > then so be it. > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Noon Silk wrote: >> Hello, >> >> So I have a question that I don't think is too far off topic for this list. >> >> Let's say I have a private git repo at, for example, bitbucket.org. >> This is all well and good and I do work in it commiting various >> things. Then, let's say I decide I'd like to temporarily give >> read-access to someone else. I can give them access to the entire repo >> via bitbucket (and probably similarly via other services); however I >> want to only give access to a certain folder. At the moment I think >> the answer is "bad luck, it should be a different repo". So, I've kind >> of done this. But is that the best answer? Is there any way anyone can >> think of to have a sort of short-term share of a repo? For example, >> one incredibly straightforward idea is to do a symlink from the folder >> to a public (or whatever) dropbox folder, and share that. Any other >> ideas? >> >> I suppose if I had my own git server the answer would be pretty >> obvious - just create new repos and kind of share them like that >> (maybe even leaving the originals in the original repo and doing some >> offensive symlink stuff). But for some reason I'm not entirely >> comfortable with the idea of creating repos on this sort of arbitrary >> basis. Is that wrong? Should I be happy with it? (One of the reasons >> I'm not is that it really makes the business of committing changes in >> this super repository hard; I'd have to write some scripts to >> auto-commit all children, or share commit messages, or something ...) >> >> One aspect of the solution is that ideally it would be possible to get >> a copy of everything via something other than git (hence I suppose the >> dropbox plan is the best one); but I'd be okay if it were a web >> interface or something. Appreciate any thoughts. >> >> -- >> Noon Silk >> >> Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ >> >> "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy >> of being this signature." > > > > -- > Noon Silk > > Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ > > "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy > of being this signature." > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > melbourne-pug at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug -- -------------------------------------------------- Tennessee Leeuwenburg http://myownhat.blogspot.com/ "Don't believe everything you think" From lars at yencken.org Mon Oct 1 02:49:03 2012 From: lars at yencken.org (Lars Yencken) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 10:49:03 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] [Slightly-OT] - Ad-hoc sharing of private git repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The other option is to use a private gist (gist.github.com), which is a clonable multi-file git repo. It's read-only for anyone you give the link to, but you can keep pushing changes to it. The downside is that you can't just use the repo you're working on, you'd need to explicitly share just the files you care about. On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Noon Silk wrote: > Upon further review, you can probably disregard this. I think the > answer is really just quite straightforward. For read-only access, > dropbox or similar (ftp, whatever) is appropriate. > > For read/write, a new repository is appropriate. In that case I should > just convert the folder to be a new repo, make it a sub-repo of my own > thing, and control the access that way. Then the only change is that I > should somehow have group commit/push commands for this repository; > then so be it. > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Noon Silk wrote: > > Hello, > > > > So I have a question that I don't think is too far off topic for this > list. > > > > Let's say I have a private git repo at, for example, bitbucket.org. > > This is all well and good and I do work in it commiting various > > things. Then, let's say I decide I'd like to temporarily give > > read-access to someone else. I can give them access to the entire repo > > via bitbucket (and probably similarly via other services); however I > > want to only give access to a certain folder. At the moment I think > > the answer is "bad luck, it should be a different repo". So, I've kind > > of done this. But is that the best answer? Is there any way anyone can > > think of to have a sort of short-term share of a repo? For example, > > one incredibly straightforward idea is to do a symlink from the folder > > to a public (or whatever) dropbox folder, and share that. Any other > > ideas? > > > > I suppose if I had my own git server the answer would be pretty > > obvious - just create new repos and kind of share them like that > > (maybe even leaving the originals in the original repo and doing some > > offensive symlink stuff). But for some reason I'm not entirely > > comfortable with the idea of creating repos on this sort of arbitrary > > basis. Is that wrong? Should I be happy with it? (One of the reasons > > I'm not is that it really makes the business of committing changes in > > this super repository hard; I'd have to write some scripts to > > auto-commit all children, or share commit messages, or something ...) > > > > One aspect of the solution is that ideally it would be possible to get > > a copy of everything via something other than git (hence I suppose the > > dropbox plan is the best one); but I'd be okay if it were a web > > interface or something. Appreciate any thoughts. > > > > -- > > Noon Silk > > > > Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ > > > > "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy > > of being this signature." > > > > -- > Noon Silk > > Fancy a quantum lunch? https://sites.google.com/site/quantumlunch/ > > "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy ? the joy > of being this signature." > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > melbourne-pug at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ed at pythoncharmers.com Mon Oct 1 03:54:45 2012 From: ed at pythoncharmers.com (Ed Schofield) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:54:45 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Next MPUG meeting is next Monday! In-Reply-To: <50683AC5.2060002@rfk.id.au> References: <50683AC5.2060002@rfk.id.au> Message-ID: On Sunday, 30 September 2012 at 10:27 PM, Ryan Kelly wrote: > There were no talks on the wiki yet, so I took the liberty of officially > adding Richard to do his message queuing talk. > > If no more exciting material comes along, I will present a short demo of > what's new and exciting in the just-released-this-very-weekend Python > version 3.3. That sounds great, Ryan. Very topical. Thanks to you and Richard for stepping up with talks. I have a talk up my sleeve too: "10 cool things about Python", a 20-minute noob-friendly talk that I gave last week to the new Canberra group. Since we're covered for today, I'll save that for another time. Cheers, Ed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sam at nipl.net Mon Oct 1 07:03:23 2012 From: sam at nipl.net (Sam Watkins) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:03:23 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] [Slightly-OT] - Ad-hoc sharing of private git repos In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20121001050323.GG28791@opal.nipl.net> hi Noon, I don't know what your use-case is, but if you find yourself wanting to share just part of a git repo, you might want to break it into smaller modules. You can use git-submodule or a script to pull them together. It is possible to preserve the history, if you want to do that. I tend to publish all my rubbish, and only keep stuff private if it really needs to be private (passwords, contacts, contract work). None of my own source code needs to be private, although some of it might be embarassingly bad! Sam From r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 03:56:28 2012 From: r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com (Richard Jones) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:56:28 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Next meeting Message-ID: Hi all, The next meeting falls on the 5th of November which is the day before Melbourne Cup Day. I don't think this should dissuade us from meeting as regular though... For the next meeting I'm mulling over a presentation about coroutines and how the new "syntax for delegating to subgenerators" (aka "yield from") can help out. Any interest or thoughts on that? (reply privately please ;-) Richard From tleeuwenburg at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 03:58:44 2012 From: tleeuwenburg at gmail.com (Tennessee Leeuwenburg) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 11:58:44 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 for going ahead on the 5th. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi all, > > The next meeting falls on the 5th of November which is the day before > Melbourne Cup Day. I don't think this should dissuade us from meeting > as regular though... > > For the next meeting I'm mulling over a presentation about coroutines > and how the new "syntax for delegating to subgenerators" (aka "yield > from") can help out. Any interest or thoughts on that? (reply > privately please ;-) > > > Richard > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > melbourne-pug at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug -- -------------------------------------------------- Tennessee Leeuwenburg http://myownhat.blogspot.com/ "Don't believe everything you think" From rhydwyn.beta at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 04:23:01 2012 From: rhydwyn.beta at gmail.com (Rhyd Olwin) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:23:01 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Next meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm good for the fifth, I have an idea for a short talk, "we have enough standards: On getting endnote biographic data into a useable form with python" Would anyone be interested? Rhydwyn On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Tennessee Leeuwenburg < tleeuwenburg at gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for going ahead on the 5th. > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Richard Jones > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The next meeting falls on the 5th of November which is the day before > > Melbourne Cup Day. I don't think this should dissuade us from meeting > > as regular though... > > > > For the next meeting I'm mulling over a presentation about coroutines > > and how the new "syntax for delegating to subgenerators" (aka "yield > > from") can help out. Any interest or thoughts on that? (reply > > privately please ;-) > > > > > > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > > melbourne-pug mailing list > > melbourne-pug at python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------- > Tennessee Leeuwenburg > http://myownhat.blogspot.com/ > "Don't believe everything you think" > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > melbourne-pug at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 05:11:40 2012 From: r1chardj0n3s at gmail.com (Richard Jones) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:11:40 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Slides from last night's message queueing talk Message-ID: A couple of people asked me so I've uploaded updated slides for my talk last night: http://www.slideshare.net/r1chardj0n3s/message-queueing-by-an-mq-noob Richard From Katie.Hardy at medibankhealth.com.au Tue Oct 2 05:20:55 2012 From: Katie.Hardy at medibankhealth.com.au (Katie Hardy) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:20:55 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Job opportunity at Medibank Health Solutions - Software Engineer in Test Message-ID: We are currently recruiting for a Software Engineer in Test. Please see the link below for more information. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this opportunity with Medibank Health Solutions. http://careers.medibankhealth.com.au/caw/en/#/job/828778/software-engine er-in-test Katie Hardy Recruitment Business Partner T 02 9425 3708 E katie.hardy at medibankhealth.com.au W www.medibankhealth.com.au _________________________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System on behalf of Medibank Health Solutions. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com _________________________________________________________________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 5535 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 13022 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1953 bytes Desc: image004.jpg URL: From chrisjrn at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 03:30:41 2012 From: chrisjrn at gmail.com (Chris Neugebauer) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:30:41 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] PyCon Australia 2013 is seeking launch sponsors Message-ID: Hi there! It's definitely early days still, but we're seeking launch sponsors (those lucky companies whose name appears on the website from the moment we launch our CFP) for PyCon Australia 2013. Having a broad range of sponsors is what helps us to make our conference as awesome as it is. This year, we have a special "Contributor" package for individuals and small businesses, at AU$800 (vs. ~$450 for a full "Professional" ticket), and packages with full sponsor benefits start at AU$1500. All packages come with complimentary "Professional" tickets to the conference. For full details of everything we're doing next year, and our sponsorship packages, see our prospectus: http://2012.pycon-au.org/prospectus_2013.pdf ? it's designed to be printed off as a shiny colour booklet that you can give to your boss. If you're not in a position to commit to sponsorship, we're also happy to get early expressions of interest, so that we can contact you again next year. If you're interested, shoot me an e-mail at sponsorship at pycon-au.org ? I'm also more than happy to help develop and put a business case if you need that. Just let me know! I look forward to hearing from you! --Chris P.S. I've written up this blog post explaining what we do with our sponsorship money here: http://chris.neugebauer.id.au/2012/10/03/pycon-australia-2013-needs-sponsors/ -- --Christopher Neugebauer Jabber: chrisjrn at gmail.com -- IRC: chrisjrn on irc.freenode.net -- AIM: chrisjrn157 -- MSN: chris at neugebauer.id.au -- WWW: http://chris.neugebauer.id.au -- Twitter/Identi.ca: @chrisjrn From n6151h at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 07:01:46 2012 From: n6151h at gmail.com (N6151H) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:01:46 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] RESTful return in pyramid Message-ID: I'm working on converting a pylons app over to pyramid. In the process, I also want to make things as RESTful as possible. To that end, I've been writing an add-on for the app using pyramid and REST patterns that is microcosmic enough to give me a fair idea (and practice) for what the larger project will entail. The issue I keep running up against is that I make heavy use of dataTables in that app. Although this doesn't inherently play REST, you can sorta make it work RESTfully and to a large extent you can do it without having to circumvent its built-in conveniences (server-side processing / paging) with your own overrides. However, this still means engineering your server-side responses to look the way dataTables wants them to look. These are not always all that RESTful, and, should you want to use the same views for something else, you must then re-engineer those responses. I can think of several approaches to making the view callables more generic, but before I go off re-inventing the wheel, thought I'd float this here and see if anyone else is doing similar work or knows of projects or modules or packages that have addressed this. Cheers, Nick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sam at nipl.net Fri Oct 5 08:17:19 2012 From: sam at nipl.net (Sam Watkins) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:17:19 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] RESTful return in pyramid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20121005061719.GA21491@opal.nipl.net> hi there, I wrote a filesystem 'fusegit' to mount git repos, in one page of python using RouteFS. It's very slow and foolish at the moment. I'll improve it later. http://sam.nipl.net/code/fusegit/ This is so I can use files that are stored compactly in a git repo, without having to do a checkout. It can save a lot of disk space on my web servers. At the moment it only mounts HEAD, but could mount different branches / revisions without using any extra storage. Sam From sam at nipl.net Fri Oct 5 08:18:36 2012 From: sam at nipl.net (Sam Watkins) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:18:36 +1000 Subject: [melbourne-pug] fusegit: mount git as a filesystem in one page of python Message-ID: <20121005061836.GB21491@opal.nipl.net> hi there, I wrote a filesystem 'fusegit' to mount git repos, in one page of python using RouteFS. It's very slow and foolish at the moment. I'll improve it later. http://sam.nipl.net/code/fusegit/ This is so I can use files that are stored compactly in a git repo, without having to do a checkout. It can save a lot of disk space on my web servers. At the moment it only mounts HEAD, but could mount different branches / revisions without using any extra storage. Sam P.S. sorry, the subject was wrong on my previous post. From gcross at fastmail.fm Sun Oct 7 02:24:21 2012 From: gcross at fastmail.fm (Graeme Cross) Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:24:21 +1100 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Notes from this month's MPUG meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1349569461.27657.140661137397601.25595233@webmail.messagingengine.com> And in case you missed the meeting and are interested, here are my notes from Monday's meeting: http://www.curiousvenn.com/?p=245 Regards Graeme On Tue, Oct 2, 2012, at 02:11 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > A couple of people asked me so I've uploaded updated slides for my > talk last night: > > http://www.slideshare.net/r1chardj0n3s/message-queueing-by-an-mq-noob > > > Richard From tleeuwenburg at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 05:47:18 2012 From: tleeuwenburg at gmail.com (Tennessee Leeuwenburg) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 14:47:18 +1100 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Notes from this month's MPUG meeting In-Reply-To: <1349569461.27657.140661137397601.25595233@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1349569461.27657.140661137397601.25595233@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Thanks Graeme, I always appreciate the summary. On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Graeme Cross wrote: > And in case you missed the meeting and are interested, here are my notes > from Monday's meeting: > > http://www.curiousvenn.com/?p=245 > > Regards > Graeme > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012, at 02:11 PM, Richard Jones wrote: >> A couple of people asked me so I've uploaded updated slides for my >> talk last night: >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/r1chardj0n3s/message-queueing-by-an-mq-noob >> >> >> Richard > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > melbourne-pug at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug -- -------------------------------------------------- Tennessee Leeuwenburg http://myownhat.blogspot.com/ "Don't believe everything you think" From acalcium at yahoo.com.au Mon Oct 8 13:07:09 2012 From: acalcium at yahoo.com.au (Chai Ang) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 04:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [melbourne-pug] The new software hygiene: Declare a license or risk losing participation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1349694429.97909.YahooMailNeo@web124504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Might be topical given the recent git postings. http://opensource.com/law/12/9/declare-software-license?sc_cid=701600000006R97AAE Regards, Chai From ben+python at benfinney.id.au Tue Oct 9 05:04:08 2012 From: ben+python at benfinney.id.au (Ben Finney) Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:04:08 +1100 Subject: [melbourne-pug] The new software hygiene: Declare a license or risk losing participation References: <1349694429.97909.YahooMailNeo@web124504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <7wzk3wbb2v.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Chai Ang writes: > Might be topical given the recent git postings. > > http://opensource.com/law/12/9/declare-software-license?sc_cid=701600000006R97AAE The advice to declare a license, early and prominently, has been good advice for a long time. I recommend anyone hoping to work with a community of programmers to get and absorb Karl Fogel's book, ?Producing Open Source Software? , which has a great deal of practical advice for setting up and maintaining a free software project. The text is a little dated, simply because the state of available tools moves so quickly. But most of the advice still holds, including the admonition to choose a strong, widely-understood free software license and clearly declare it on the project's site. Buy the book if you can, even though it's licensed as free culture. -- \ ?Two possibilities exist: Either we are alone in the Universe | `\ or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.? ?Arthur C. Clarke, | _o__) 1999 | Ben Finney From nick.mellor.groups at pobox.com Thu Oct 25 05:50:06 2012 From: nick.mellor.groups at pobox.com (Nick Mellor) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:50:06 +1100 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Looking for a Django developer for small professional organisation In-Reply-To: <7wzk3wbb2v.fsf@benfinney.id.au> References: <1349694429.97909.YahooMailNeo@web124504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <7wzk3wbb2v.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Message-ID: <5088B6EE.20008@pobox.com> Hi all, We're a small professional organisation of 120 people looking for a developer for our new website. If any of you have decent Django and web design experience and are interested in such small fry, please let me know. We have a good idea of what we want on the website (we have a site map sketched out with professional help.) We need to get up, and running with at least a skeleton website within 4 months. Existing website: http://www.austat.org.au Total budget (including design) not to exceed $10,000. Thanks for any expressions of interest, Best wishes, Nick (0458 192 321) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From javier at candeira.com Tue Oct 30 12:45:52 2012 From: javier at candeira.com (Javier Candeira) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:45:52 +1100 Subject: [melbourne-pug] Next MPUG meeting, next Monday 5th of November Message-ID: Hi everyone. Next Monday is the first Monday of the month, so I guess that means we have a date for Python hijinks, pizza and beer, hosted by Inspire 9 at 1/41 Stewart Street in Richmond. Pizza will be ordered after a show of hands bearing $10 bills, and beer is from the Inspire 9 fridge, $5 contribution strongly encouraged, come on, don't be a moocher! I have spent the past week wrangling the Rackspace Cloudserver Nextgen API for a client, so I will be giving a talk about the clouds, with a minishow of the apache-libcloud library and a minimal discussion of pros and cons of Rackspace Cloud vs AWS. An unnamed soul has also written themselves up on the wiki for a talk about building an universal remote control with Arduino and Python. And there's always more time, so if anybody has a talk they'd like to give, or a question they'd like to ask the assembled Python community of Melbourne and environs, please speak up here on the list, or go add yourself directly in the wiki: http://j.mp/mpug Cheers, Javier