From tcaswell at gmail.com  Sat Aug 27 14:09:42 2016
From: tcaswell at gmail.com (Thomas Caswell)
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 18:09:42 +0000
Subject: [Matplotlib-announce] mpl governance
In-Reply-To: <CAA48SF-sLrWoQoWsmstvdDTL3O+-n4=UAz-_QgkTfK2n66UD+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA48SF-sLrWoQoWsmstvdDTL3O+-n4=UAz-_QgkTfK2n66UD+A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAA48SF8=a7A2bMRZ9uEaNRontSvuF+h90TiYRh57o5uQkOr-1g@mail.gmail.com>

Folks,

Following up on last month's email, are there any comments, for or against,
adopting the Jupyter governance model and the mechanism of ratifying the
adoption?

Tom

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 6:32 PM Thomas Caswell <tcaswell at gmail.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> During the sprints at SciPy Mike Droettboom and I started to adapt the
> Jupyter governance documents for matplotlib.
>
> We are doing this in the open, and a pull request of the changes is at:
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/governance/pull/1
>
> To be clear, this is a work in progress and is not final or in force.
>
> We propose the mechanism for ratifying the these documents is to, after
> input from the community, have the current "matplotlib Executive Committee"
> (the signers of the FSA with NUMFocus) vote.
>
> Tom
>
> ps A very similar email was sent to the matplotlib-devel list on July 17
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/matplotlib-announce/attachments/20160827/5da83e3c/attachment.html>