[Mailman-Users] Handling Munged From Addresses

[Mark Sapiro]

On 2/27/20 11:54 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> 
> I didn't realize that there were OS dependencies in the DMARC
> mitigation. I thought it was all within the mailman code.


It's not an OS dependency. It's a downstream package dependency. If I
look at <https://rpms.remirepo.net/rpmphp/zoom.php?rpm=mailman>, The
newest RHEL/Centos RPM is 2.1.15-26.el7_4.1. Any DMARC mitigations in
this package were backported by RedHat as there were no DMARC
mitigations upstream before 2.1.16.

There does appear to be an EL-8 rpm at
<http://vault.centos.org/8.0.1905/AppStream/Source/SPackages/mailman-2.1.29-4.module_el8.0.0+34+0459d3d0.src.rpm>.
You might consider trying that.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/attachments/20200227/532c33d4/attachment.sig>