[Mailman-Users] OT - Smart .forward replacement?

[Grant Taylor]

On 11/25/18 1:03 PM, Lindsay Haisley (linode) wrote:
> mail redirected through a .forward  will always fail SPF validation.

That is not always accurate.  It is relatively easy to configure an MTA 
to support Sender Rewriting Scheme, either for everything that is sent 
out or just things that don't originate from the system.

Thus a .forward is not guaranteed to fail SPF validation.  In fact, I 
would expect SPF validation to succeed on servers that are configured 
with SRS.



-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/attachments/20181125/5ad8b94f/attachment.bin>