[Mailman-Users] resend - mailman 2.1.21 - dmarc check problem

[Mark Sapiro]

On 05/05/2016 04:31 PM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> Mark,
> 
> Sorry for the duplicate.
> 
> In message <572AA8E4.9070405 at msapiro.net>
> Mark Sapiro writes:
>  
>> On 05/04/2016 09:27 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>>> I'm resending this with a new subject.  The last email just
>>> disappeared (no bounce).  Maybe having
>>> DMARC_ORGANIZATIONAL_DOMAIN_DATA_URL in the subject tripped an all
>>> caps in subject test.  (Or the moderator is slacking?)
>>  
>>  
>> A moderator (me) approved your post and cleared your mod bit
>> approximately 2 hours before you posted this. My reply to that post is
>> at <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2016-May/080772.html>.
>>  
>> I don't know why you didn't receive it. It was successfully sent per
>>  
>> May  4 10:36:04 mail postfix/smtp[22778]: 3r0LDW0F1DzFqP0:
>> to=<curtis at ipv6.occnc.com>,
>> relay=mta2-em1.orleans.occnc.com[50.252.223.140]:25, delay=42,
>> delays=0.08/0/31/11, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
>> 316BF9DDA)
>>  
>> (time stamp is UTC - 0400)
> 
> Odd that is says 10:36.  The URL in the archive says Wed May 4
> 21:29:26 EDT 2016 which matches mail headers.


Look at the X-Mailman-Approved-At: header.


>> Maybe the ALL CAPS filtered it at your end.
> 
> I got the reply.  I just didn't get any "held by moderator" so wasn't
> sure if my first mail went into a black hole.  Did one get sent?


No. We don't send them. They create spam backscatter.


> Mail crossed.  Your mail was sent (according to mail headers) at:
> 
>   Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:29:26 -0700
> 
> My duplicate was sent on:
> 
>   Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 12:27:24 -0400
> 
> which is 15:27 in -0700 land.  My duplicate was sent 3 hours before
> your reply.


Agreed, but your original was approved and delivered to the list at
10:35 -0400, almost two hours before your follow-up was sent.


> In any case, sorry for the duplicate.  If this was a "first time only"
> moderator action, then it can't happen again.
> 
> Either way I appologize for being impatient.


Apology accepted. No problem. And your mod bit is now cleared so it was
a one time thing.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan