[Mailman-Users] AOL redacts user addresses even with VERP and full personalization enabled

[Russell Clemings]

>From the reports I've received, it looks as if they redact only from the
headers. With personalization on, I put a "%(user_address)s" token in the
non-digest footer and as of the last report I got (June 8) it came through
the feedback loop intact. I've never figured out a similar fix for digests,
however, and that seems to be where most of the reports come from. So maybe
there's room for a new approach there.

rac

---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lindsay Haisley <fmouse at fmp.com>
> To: mailman-users at python.org
> Cc:
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:54:34 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL redacts user addresses even with VERP and
> full personalization enabled
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 20:42 -0400, Dave (FitEyes) wrote:
> > Now that you motivated me, I actually read the blog post too:
> >
> http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2008/08/13/more-on-the-upcoming-feedback-loop-conversion/
> >
> > It now seems pretty clear that we can use these reports in the way
> > Lindsay and others have proposed.
> >
> Well if this is so, are they still redacting the VERP recipient
> addresses?
>
> --
> Lindsay Haisley       |  "We are all broken toasters, but we still
> FMP Computer Services |    manage to make toast"
> 512-259-1190          |
> http://www.fmp.com    |        - Cheryl Dehut
>
>
>