[Mailman-Users] Archives

Young, Darren darren.young at chicagobooth.edu
Thu Jan 21 12:59:33 CET 2010


Yea, ArchRunner is running:

[root at bushlms01 archive]# ps -eaf | grep -i arch
mailman   2090  2077  0 Jan20 ?        00:00:00 /usr/bin/python
/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner --runner=ArchRunner:0:1 -s

/usr/local/mailman/qfiles/archive is empty:

[root at bushlms01 archive]# pwd 
/usr/local/mailman/qfiles/archive

[root at bushlms01 archive]# ls -l
total 0

I'll put in to have Mailman brought up to 2.1.x during a maintenance
window. 2.1.13 appears to be the latest in the 2.1.x series, would that
be the one to go with now?

Any other thoughts? Python version issues with archiving?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:mark at msapiro.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:46 PM
> To: mailman-users at python.org; Young, Darren
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Archives
> 
> Young, Darren wrote:
> 
> > Not much, close in all of them:
> 
> 
> As I said in another recent reply - "If I had a nickel for every time
I
> didn't realize the obvious ..." :)
> 
> Is ArchRunner running? What's in /usr/local/mailman/qfiles/archive?
> 
> 
> > The only one that sticks out but was earlier:
> >
> > Jan 20 12:47:42 2009 (9809) admin.py access for non-existent list:
> > daily-job-postings
> > Jan 20 12:47:50 2009 (9813) admin.py access for non-existent list:
> > daily-job-postings
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726): Traceback (most recent call
> last):
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 270, in ?
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      main()
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 230, in main
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      qrunner.run()
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 87, in run
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      self._cleanup()
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/BounceRunner.py", line 220, in
> > _cleanup
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      BounceMixin._cleanup(self)
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/BounceRunner.py", line 132, in
> > _cleanup
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      self._register_bounces()
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/BounceRunner.py", line 120, in
> > _register_bounces
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      mlist.registerBounce(addr,
> msg,
> > day=day)
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):   File
> > "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Bouncer.py", line 131, in registerBounce
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726):      time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y',
> day +
> > (0,)*6))
> > Jan 20 12:34:52 2010 qrunner(7726): ValueError :  day of year out of
> > range
> 
> This is an incompatibility between Mailman 2.1.5 and older and Python
> 2.4.x and newer. If you can't upgrade Mailman, the attached
> Bouncer.py.patch will fix it.
> 
> --
> Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
> San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan



More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list