[Mailman-Users] Microsoft Outlook and footer/signature"attachments"

[Barry Warsaw]

On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:16 PM, LuKreme wrote:

> On 11-Sep-2009, at 11:41, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Yes, that's the way it works, but maybe it shouldn't. What do people
>> think about changing this?
>
> Well, I'd be in favor of forcing the rfc2369 headers to always be  
> there, myself. I hate it when lists don't have them.

Historically, the option to remove them was added because people  
complained that their MUA (that shall remain nameless) could not hide  
them.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/attachments/20090911/2e79a7ff/attachment.pgp>