[Mailman-Users] rejection messages

[Mark Sapiro]

J.A. Terranson wrote:
>
>	If i reject a posting for exceeding size limits, the reason given 
>will be "no reason given" if I reject using the default interface, and 
>will only state the correct reason (too bog, please trim) if I reject from 
>the "details" interface.
>
>	This is both unintuitive and wrong: It was held for size, the 
>first notice says it was held for size, and it is rejected for the reason 
>held.  Shouldnt the default reason (the reason for being held) be the 
>reject reason?


Yes, it probably should. It currently doesn't primarily because the
message metadata which contains the reason is not retrieved during
processing of actions from the admindb summary form. I think the
reason for this is historical.

I'm working on a fix.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan