[Mailman-Users] Bounce Message, ReturnPath/ErrorsTo issue

Mark Sapiro mark at msapiro.net
Thu Jul 3 06:44:56 CEST 2008


Michael Kabotwrote:

>Configuration
>- CentOS 5 64 bit
>- Mailman 2.1.9
>- Qmail with Plesk 8.3 mods
>
>I have an interesting bounce issue occurring.  
>- Email is sent to a Mailman List
>- List sends to each address
>- One of the addresses bounces
>- The bounce message ends with the right FROM and TO headers, but the wrong
>RETURN-PATH and ERRORS-TO headers.
>
>Is this a Mailman or Qmail issue?
>
>Here is the bounce message 
>
>------------------
>Return-Path: <mailman-bounces@[WRONGDOMAIN.COM]>
>Received: (qmail 28263 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2008 14:46:36 -0400
>Received: from localhost (HELO [MAIL.RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]) (127.0.0.1)
>  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jul 2008 14:46:36 -0400


It looks like below here up to my next comment are the actual bounce
notice headers with Return-Path: <> indicating a null envelope from
which should be the case for a normal bounce.

The headers above here look like Mailman received this bounce and
resent it to a list owner. When sending to a list owner, Mailman sets
the envelope from the site list (mailman) -bounces address. Is
[WRONGDOMAIN.COM] the domain of the site list?


>Return-Path: <>
>Delivered-To: [LISTNAME]-bounces@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>Received: (qmail 28252 invoked for bounce); 2 Jul 2008 14:46:34 -0400
>Date: 2 Jul 2008 14:46:34 -0400
>From: MAILER-DAEMON@[MAIL.RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>To: [LISTNAME]-bounces@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>Subject: failure notice


And the header below may have also been added by Mailman in resending.


>Errors-To: mailman-bounces@[WRONGDOMAIN.COM]
>
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at [MAIL.RIGHTDOMAIN.COM].
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
>[BADEMAIL ADDRESS]:
>[REMOTEIP] does not like recipient.
>Remote host said: 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does
>not exist. Please
>550-5.1.1 try double-checking the recipient's email address for typos
>550-5.1.1 or unnecessary spaces. Learn more at                     
>550 5.1.1 http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6596
>23si5229629hsd.10 
>Giving up on [REMOTEIP].
>
>--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
>Return-Path: [LISTNAME]-bounces@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>Received: (qmail 28243 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2008 14:46:34 -0400
>Received: from localhost (HELO [MAIL.RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]) (127.0.0.1)
>  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jul 2008 14:46:34 -0400
>Return-Path: [SENDEREMAIL]
>Delivered-To: [LISTNAME]@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>Received: (qmail 28072 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2008 14:46:32 -0400
>Received: [OMMITTED]
>Received: [OMMITTED]
>Message-ID: [OMMITTED]
>Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:46:27 -0400
>From: [OMMITTED]
>User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: [LISTNAME]@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Subject: [members] whiter water trip update
>X-BeenThere: [LISTNAME]@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
>Precedence: list
>Errors-To: [LISTNAME]-bounces@[RIGHTDOMAIN.COM]
>
>[ORIGINAL MESSAGE]
>
>------------------


The thing that's strange in all the above is that Mailman (at least
standard GNU Mailman) doesn't redirect bounces like this. It sends a
totally new message to the list owner with the original bounce
attached.

Also, assuming [BADEMAIL ADDRESS]: in the notice was enclosed in <> as
in <bad at example.com>:, it would not have been an unrecognized bounce
in 2.1.9.

Is this Mailman 2.1.9 installed from our distribution, or is it a Plesk
or other package?

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan



More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list