[Mailman-Users] Spam to list-owner
Lindsay Haisley
fmouse-mailman at fmp.com
Sat Dec 20 07:03:52 CET 2008
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 23:38 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > Mailman already has a SpamDetect module which is reasonably useless, and
> > discards (not rejects) spam internally. What I'd really like is a way
>
> Lindsay, you cannot, repeat NOT -reject- after you have accepted a
> message. Nonononono! Go look at the RFC if you have any doubt
> whatsoever.
Why not? Mailman does it. There are many settings in Mailman which
provide the option to silently _discard_ emails such as postings from
non-members of a list.
But I'm being perverse ;-) I've read the RFCs and understand what
you're saying here. Basically, in the system I'm using, the _only_ mail
that gets dropped altogether is list requests which are assigned a SA
level over 5. Everything else for users and lists is quarantined or
segregated, or rejected at the front door.
> > I'm always doing things with my servers which others tell me I shouldn't
> > do, and as long as I'm careful about security and efficiency I often end
> > up with some pretty elegant and flexible solutions. And then people who
> > told me not to do these things want to know how I got things to work the
> > way I did ;-)
>
> And then shake their heads that you really did it?
<grin!>
> Please. Don't reject after an accept: that is de-facto spam.
Well if it's any consolation to you, I don't ever explicitly send a
rejection back to the envelope sender :-)
--
Lindsay Haisley | "In an open world, | PGP public key
FMP Computer Services | who needs Windows | available at
512-259-1190 | or Gates" | http://pubkeys.fmp.com
http://www.fmp.com | |
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list